The Explosive Nature and Apocalypse of the Russian Avant-Garde: Futurism vs. Bolshevism

This article aims to examine the factors contributing to the “explosive” (in accordance with Juri Lotman’s theory) but the brief flourishing of the avant-garde in Russian culture. Furthermore, it seeks to demonstrate that the apocalyptic vision of old Russia encompassed not only societal transformation but also the demise of avant-garde poetics in post-revolutionary Russia. Paradoxically, while the early Soviet avant-garde presented itself as a revolutionary political and aesthetic movement, Bolsheviks maintained a dismissive attitude towards Futurists and the LEF group. In Literature and Revolution Leon Trotsky asserted that futurism is no less a product of the poetic past. This disconnect suggests divergent interpretations of “revolution” and “revolutionary” between Bolsheviks and Futurists. Boris Groys emphasizes that the October Revolution was more traditional than avant-garde aesthetics, positioning the avant-garde as counter-revolutionary art.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Primerjalna književnost
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3986/pkn.v48.i1.04
Primary Topic
European Linguistics and Anthropology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Explosive Nature and Apocalypse of the Russian Avant-Garde: Futurism vs. Bolshevism

Ivana Peruško
Primerjalna književnost
European Linguistics and Anthropology
article

The Explosive Nature and Apocalypse of the Russian Avant-Garde: Futurism vs. Bolshevism

Ivana Peruško
article en

Abstract

This article aims to examine the factors contributing to the “explosive” (in accordance with Juri Lotman’s theory) but the brief flourishing of the avant-garde in Russian culture. Furthermore, it seeks to demonstrate that the apocalyptic vision of old Russia encompassed not only societal transformation but also the demise of avant-garde poetics in post-revolutionary Russia. Paradoxically, while the early Soviet avant-garde presented itself as a revolutionary political and aesthetic movement, Bolsheviks maintained a dismissive attitude towards Futurists and the LEF group. In Literature and Revolution Leon Trotsky asserted that futurism is no less a product of the poetic past. This disconnect suggests divergent interpretations of “revolution” and “revolutionary” between Bolsheviks and Futurists. Boris Groys emphasizes that the October Revolution was more traditional than avant-garde aesthetics, positioning the avant-garde as counter-revolutionary art.

Primerjalna književnostVol. 48(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
European Linguistics and Anthropology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Explosive Nature and Apocalypse of the Russian Avant-Garde: Futurism vs. Bolshevism — Ivana Peruško · Primerjalna književnost (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS