Arrabales en el Quito colonial temprano

This article explores the formation of the indigenous neighborhoods of San Sebastián and San Blas between the founding of Quito by the Spanish in 1534 and the time the neighborhoods officially became part of the city in 1573. The article shows that the neighborhood formation reflected a dualistic pattern intrinsic to colonial urbanism—gridiron in the city center and primarily Indigenous peripheral neighborhoods. It argues that their creation resulted from a trio of colonial project-derived stimuli. The first, evangelization, sought to concentrate the surrounding Indigenous population into an established location. Second, alliances between colonizers and high-level Indigenous authorities required the latter’s proximity to manage the taxpaying, newly converted population. The third and final stimulus was the migration of Indigenous labor toward the city in search of opportunities in urban construction, artisanal trades and domestic service. Tracing the formation of a colonial urban periphery requires including Indigenous people in the city’s history, not merely as inhabitants of a latent pre-Hispanic occupation that survived the Conquest, but as agents in shaping the colonial city.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Estudios Atacameños Arqueología y antropología surandinas
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22199/10.22199/issn.0718-1043-6423
Primary Topic
Historical Studies in Latin America
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Arrabales en el Quito colonial temprano

Mireya Salgado Gómez, Carlos Espinosa
Estudios Atacameños Arqueología y antropología surandinas
Historical Studies in Latin America
article

Arrabales en el Quito colonial temprano

Mireya Salgado Gómez, Carlos Espinosa
article en

Abstract

This article explores the formation of the indigenous neighborhoods of San Sebastián and San Blas between the founding of Quito by the Spanish in 1534 and the time the neighborhoods officially became part of the city in 1573. The article shows that the neighborhood formation reflected a dualistic pattern intrinsic to colonial urbanism—gridiron in the city center and primarily Indigenous peripheral neighborhoods. It argues that their creation resulted from a trio of colonial project-derived stimuli. The first, evangelization, sought to concentrate the surrounding Indigenous population into an established location. Second, alliances between colonizers and high-level Indigenous authorities required the latter’s proximity to manage the taxpaying, newly converted population. The third and final stimulus was the migration of Indigenous labor toward the city in search of opportunities in urban construction, artisanal trades and domestic service. Tracing the formation of a colonial urban periphery requires including Indigenous people in the city’s history, not merely as inhabitants of a latent pre-Hispanic occupation that survived the Conquest, but as agents in shaping the colonial city.

Estudios Atacameños Arqueología y antropología surandinasVol. 71
Universidad San Francisco de Quito (EC)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Historical Studies in Latin America
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.