Legal Regulation of Harassment over Food Delivery Reviews

This study uses literature and logical analysis to explore the legal regulation of the harassment of poor reviews of takeaways. The study finds that the right to bad reviews has the attributes of both supervisory rights and personality rights, and its protection is of great value to the market order, personality dignity and platform governance, but faces the dilemmas of ambiguous legal characterisation, unclear platform responsibilities and difficulties in defending rights, which are manifested in the problems of cross-criminal and civil identification, inconsistent application of laws and imbalance of evidence. In this regard, we propose a “legislation-platform-rights protection” trinity programme: refining the legal qualitative standards, perfecting the platform responsibility system, and innovating the evidence and rights protection mechanism, which will provide a reference for consumer protection and platform governance in the digital economy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Economics Law and Policy
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22158/elp.v8n1p127
Primary Topic
Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Regulation of Harassment over Food Delivery Reviews

Ying Liu
Economics Law and Policy
Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
article

Legal Regulation of Harassment over Food Delivery Reviews

Ying Liu
article en

Abstract

This study uses literature and logical analysis to explore the legal regulation of the harassment of poor reviews of takeaways. The study finds that the right to bad reviews has the attributes of both supervisory rights and personality rights, and its protection is of great value to the market order, personality dignity and platform governance, but faces the dilemmas of ambiguous legal characterisation, unclear platform responsibilities and difficulties in defending rights, which are manifested in the problems of cross-criminal and civil identification, inconsistent application of laws and imbalance of evidence. In this regard, we propose a “legislation-platform-rights protection” trinity programme: refining the legal qualitative standards, perfecting the platform responsibility system, and innovating the evidence and rights protection mechanism, which will provide a reference for consumer protection and platform governance in the digital economy.

Economics Law and PolicyVol. 8(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Legal Regulation of Harassment over Food Delivery Reviews — Ying Liu · Economics Law and Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS