The accuracy of FibroScan, FIB-4, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score in predicting biopsy-defined fibrosis and steatosis across all fibrosis stages in patients with metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease

Liver biopsy is the gold standard for quantifying steatosis and fibrosis. It is unclear how noninvasive tests (NITs) accurately correlate to liver biopsy. The aim of this study was to characterize patients with metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease who underwent liver biopsy in South Texas and had at least 1 contemporaneous NIT result available to determine the accuracy of NITs as compared to liver biopsy in accurately staging fibrosis and steatosis. The study included 460 patients with liver biopsy and at least 1 NIT. Data captured was based on standard of care and was non-interventional in nature. Performance characteristics of the NITs were analyzed based on the degree of fibrosis defined by liver biopsy. The majority of patients were female (66.4%), middle-aged (51 years), and Hispanic/Latino (73.3%). In patients with F3/F4 fibrosis, FibroScan accurately identified only 45.9% with advanced fibrosis. Even when using society recommended results from fibrosis-4 combined with FibroScan, concordance with liver biopsy was only reported in 68.9% of patients. Patients with biopsy-defined advanced steatosis (S3) were identified as having advanced steatosis by FibroScan controlled attenuation parameter score in 89.7% of patients; however, controlled attenuation parameter score overly predicted advanced steatosis in 81.4% with biopsy-defined S1/S2 steatosis. NITs should be used as first line to assess steatosis and fibrosis; however, the optimal combination of these tests has not been elucidated and properly compared to liver biopsy to assess true diagnostic accuracy. Until the optimal set of NITs are found, any diagnostic or clinical inconsistencies should be resolved with liver biopsy to avoid staging errors, particularly underestimating fibrosis in those with advanced disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000042016
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The accuracy of FibroScan, FIB-4, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score in predicting biopsy-defined fibrosis and steatosis across all fibrosis stages in patients with metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease

Fatma Özgüç Çömlek, Harry Nguyen, Eugenia Tsai, Lisa D. Pedicone et al.
2 citations
Medicine
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
2.71
article

The accuracy of FibroScan, FIB-4, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score in predicting biopsy-defined fibrosis and steatosis across all fibrosis stages in patients with metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease

Fatma Özgüç Çömlek, Harry Nguyen, Eugenia Tsai, Lisa D. Pedicone, Fred Poordad, Fabian V. Rodas, Carmen Landaverde, Martin Goros, Keerthi Thallapureddy, Iqra Kazi, Eric Lawitz, Nagasri Shankar, David Twitchell, Chioma Owo, Kristen Ott, Jonathan Gelfond, Dixon T. K. Kwok, Nina Kumar, Anna Liles
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Liver biopsy is the gold standard for quantifying steatosis and fibrosis. It is unclear how noninvasive tests (NITs) accurately correlate to liver biopsy. The aim of this study was to characterize patients with metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease who underwent liver biopsy in South Texas and had at least 1 contemporaneous NIT result available to determine the accuracy of NITs as compared to liver biopsy in accurately staging fibrosis and steatosis. The study included 460 patients with liver biopsy and at least 1 NIT. Data captured was based on standard of care and was non-interventional in nature. Performance characteristics of the NITs were analyzed based on the degree of fibrosis defined by liver biopsy. The majority of patients were female (66.4%), middle-aged (51 years), and Hispanic/Latino (73.3%). In patients with F3/F4 fibrosis, FibroScan accurately identified only 45.9% with advanced fibrosis. Even when using society recommended results from fibrosis-4 combined with FibroScan, concordance with liver biopsy was only reported in 68.9% of patients. Patients with biopsy-defined advanced steatosis (S3) were identified as having advanced steatosis by FibroScan controlled attenuation parameter score in 89.7% of patients; however, controlled attenuation parameter score overly predicted advanced steatosis in 81.4% with biopsy-defined S1/S2 steatosis. NITs should be used as first line to assess steatosis and fibrosis; however, the optimal combination of these tests has not been elucidated and properly compared to liver biopsy to assess true diagnostic accuracy. Until the optimal set of NITs are found, any diagnostic or clinical inconsistencies should be resolved with liver biopsy to avoid staging errors, particularly underestimating fibrosis in those with advanced disease.

MedicineVol. 104(17)
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), Texas Liver Institute (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.