Immunity Of Foreign Embassies From Jurisdiction Of Indonesian Industrial Relations Court Of Indonesia (A Case Study of Decision Number 376 K/Pdt.Sus-Phi/2013)

This research aims to determine the position of foreign embassies within the jurisdiction of the Indonesian Industrial Relations Court under the 1961 Vienna Convention and the implementation of foreign embassies’ diplomatic immunity by the Industrial Relations Court in Decision Number 376 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2013. This research uses a normative research method, employing both an international agreement approach and a conceptual approach. Foreign embassies enjoy several broad immunities from the jurisdiction of the receiving country. Courts in Indonesia cannot necessarily hear or decide cases involving foreign embassies. A special agreement is needed that allows diplomatic agents to comply with applicable laws in Indonesia, and this must be submitted separately. Diplomatic representatives are parties who can be involved in industrial relations dispute cases at the Industrial Relations Court. Under the 1961 Vienna Convention, these immunities and privileges are not absolute, and the receiving country has the power to reject diplomatic representation considered problematic or persona non grata.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mataram Journal of International Law
Published
2024-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29303/majil.v2i2.5120
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immunity Of Foreign Embassies From Jurisdiction Of Indonesian Industrial Relations Court Of Indonesia (A Case Study of Decision Number 376 K/Pdt.Sus-Phi/2013)

Diva Pitaloka, Muh. Risnain, Fahar Fatoni
Mataram Journal of International Law
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Immunity Of Foreign Embassies From Jurisdiction Of Indonesian Industrial Relations Court Of Indonesia (A Case Study of Decision Number 376 K/Pdt.Sus-Phi/2013)

Diva Pitaloka, Muh. Risnain, Fahar Fatoni
article en

Abstract

This research aims to determine the position of foreign embassies within the jurisdiction of the Indonesian Industrial Relations Court under the 1961 Vienna Convention and the implementation of foreign embassies’ diplomatic immunity by the Industrial Relations Court in Decision Number 376 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2013. This research uses a normative research method, employing both an international agreement approach and a conceptual approach. Foreign embassies enjoy several broad immunities from the jurisdiction of the receiving country. Courts in Indonesia cannot necessarily hear or decide cases involving foreign embassies. A special agreement is needed that allows diplomatic agents to comply with applicable laws in Indonesia, and this must be submitted separately. Diplomatic representatives are parties who can be involved in industrial relations dispute cases at the Industrial Relations Court. Under the 1961 Vienna Convention, these immunities and privileges are not absolute, and the receiving country has the power to reject diplomatic representation considered problematic or persona non grata.

Mataram Journal of International LawVol. 2(2)
University of Mataram (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Immunity Of Foreign Embassies From Jurisdiction Of Indonesian Industrial Relations Court Of Indonesia (A Case Study of Decision Number 376 K/Pdt.Sus-Phi/2013) — Diva Pitaloka, Muh. Risnain, et al. · Mataram Journal of International Law (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS