Advancing Geosite Evaluation through Continuous Visitor-Centric Assessment

Abstract Geosite assessment evaluates the suitability of spectacular and scientifically important abiotic natural objects for geoheritage and geotourism purposes. Various quantitative and qualitative assessment methodologies have usually reflected an expert’s opinion or groups of experts so far. As geosites are increasingly becoming tourist destinations, there is also a growing emphasis on visitor feedback. Therefore, the expert’s approach is not always the best way to evaluate a geosite with a role in tourism. The Modified Geosite Assessment Model (M-GAM) quantitative method incorporates non-experts’ opinions in the evaluation. Based on it, we have developed a visitor query system and collected visitor data from 2018 to 2022 for 14 geosites in the Bakony–Balaton UNESCO Global Geopark, Hungary. A total number of 1072 fills over four years, and the M-GAM indicators made it possible to identify the main benefits of continuous visitor involvement in geosite assessment. These are 1) realising the current state (scientific-infrastructural strengths and weaknesses) of distinct geosites from the visitors’ point of view, 2) detecting possible changes in tourist attitude with continuous monitoring, 3) most importantly giving hints for geosite managers on whether and how to develop local infrastructure, the communication and promotion of a particular site. Due to the emphasis on continuous data collection, the method used and presented here is referred to as the Monitoring Geosite Assessment Model (Mo-GAM). Despite the time-consuming work and sometimes statistically small number of responses collected per site, this monitoring methodology can track the physical condition, infrastructural attributions, and the level of science dissemination at geosites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoheritage
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01104-6
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing Geosite Evaluation through Continuous Visitor-Centric Assessment

Márton Pál, Gáspár Albert
4 citations
Geoheritage
Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation
9.39
article

Advancing Geosite Evaluation through Continuous Visitor-Centric Assessment

Márton Pál, Gáspár Albert
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Geosite assessment evaluates the suitability of spectacular and scientifically important abiotic natural objects for geoheritage and geotourism purposes. Various quantitative and qualitative assessment methodologies have usually reflected an expert’s opinion or groups of experts so far. As geosites are increasingly becoming tourist destinations, there is also a growing emphasis on visitor feedback. Therefore, the expert’s approach is not always the best way to evaluate a geosite with a role in tourism. The Modified Geosite Assessment Model (M-GAM) quantitative method incorporates non-experts’ opinions in the evaluation. Based on it, we have developed a visitor query system and collected visitor data from 2018 to 2022 for 14 geosites in the Bakony–Balaton UNESCO Global Geopark, Hungary. A total number of 1072 fills over four years, and the M-GAM indicators made it possible to identify the main benefits of continuous visitor involvement in geosite assessment. These are 1) realising the current state (scientific-infrastructural strengths and weaknesses) of distinct geosites from the visitors’ point of view, 2) detecting possible changes in tourist attitude with continuous monitoring, 3) most importantly giving hints for geosite managers on whether and how to develop local infrastructure, the communication and promotion of a particular site. Due to the emphasis on continuous data collection, the method used and presented here is referred to as the Monitoring Geosite Assessment Model (Mo-GAM). Despite the time-consuming work and sometimes statistically small number of responses collected per site, this monitoring methodology can track the physical condition, infrastructural attributions, and the level of science dissemination at geosites.

GeoheritageVol. 17(2)
Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, Innovációs és Technológiai Minisztérium
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Geotourism and Geoheritage Conservation
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.