Causal emissions factor benchmarks during contingent nuclear outages

Abstract One method to decrease carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions in the electricity sector is to shift the timing of electric load from periods when it causes more pollution to times when it causes less. A key step in implementing this ‘load-shifting’ strategy involves measuring changes of emissions as a consequence of changes in electricity load. While multiple modeling algorithms have previously estimated this quantity, previous methods have been forced to either calibrate against dispatch modeling assumptions, or against statistical models that might not be free of causal confounders. Further, none of these algorithms have been tested in situations where the changes in load is large, as is typical in the load-shifting context. In this work, we demonstrate a technique to estimate this consequential change in emissions using direct empirical evidence. We do so by leveraging a causally valid natural experiment involving unplanned nuclear power plant outages. The values obtained in this paper can serve as a baseline with which to help evaluate the performance of the modeling algorithms in the regimes important for load-shifting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Communications
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/add1b3
Primary Topic
Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Causal emissions factor benchmarks during contingent nuclear outages

Sam Koebrich, Pierre Christian, Gavin McCormick, Joel Cofield
Environmental Research Communications
Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
article

Causal emissions factor benchmarks during contingent nuclear outages

Sam Koebrich, Pierre Christian, Gavin McCormick, Joel Cofield
article en

Abstract

Abstract One method to decrease carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions in the electricity sector is to shift the timing of electric load from periods when it causes more pollution to times when it causes less. A key step in implementing this ‘load-shifting’ strategy involves measuring changes of emissions as a consequence of changes in electricity load. While multiple modeling algorithms have previously estimated this quantity, previous methods have been forced to either calibrate against dispatch modeling assumptions, or against statistical models that might not be free of causal confounders. Further, none of these algorithms have been tested in situations where the changes in load is large, as is typical in the load-shifting context. In this work, we demonstrate a technique to estimate this consequential change in emissions using direct empirical evidence. We do so by leveraging a causally valid natural experiment involving unplanned nuclear power plant outages. The values obtained in this paper can serve as a baseline with which to help evaluate the performance of the modeling algorithms in the regimes important for load-shifting.

Environmental Research CommunicationsVol. 7(5)
World Water Watch (US)
Microsoft, Meta
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Causal emissions factor benchmarks during contingent nuclear outages — Sam Koebrich, Pierre Christian, et al. · Environmental Research Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS