Multi-device analysis of energy loss duration and pellet penetration with implications for shattered pellet injection in ITER

Abstract A robust disruption mitigation system (DMS) requires accurate characterization of key disruption timescales, one of the most notable being the thermal quench (TQ). Recent modeling of shattered pellet injection (SPI) into ITER plasmas, using JOREK and INDEX, suggests long TQ durations (6–10 ms) and slow cold front propagation due to the large plasma size. If validated, these predictions would have an impact on the desired pellet parameters and mitigation strategies for the ITER DMS. To resolve these questions, a database of SPI experiments from several small-to-large sized devices (J-TEXT, KSTAR, AUG, DIII-D, and JET) has been compiled under the auspices of the International Tokamak Physics Activity MHD, disruptions, and control topical group. Analysis of the energy loss duration (proxy for the TQ duration) with machine size is presented for both mixed neon/deuterium (Ne/D) SPI and pure deuterium (D) SPI. Several metrics for the energy loss onset (e.g. soft x-ray signal drop, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>I</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> dip, and radiation flash) were considered as the conventional metric, electron cyclotron emission, is often cut-off during SPI. Several scalings with different onset metrics showed an increase in energy loss duration with machine size. The energy loss duration was additionally shown to be a function of the ratio between the number of SPI neon atoms injected and the stored energy. Analysis of the pellet shard position relative to the cold front found that in larger devices, pellets are typically found inboard of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> surface at the energy loss onset. Lastly, the delay between the pellet shards hitting the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> surface and the energy loss onset was additionally found to increase with machine size. This suggests that the pellet shards in large devices will penetrate faster and further than the cooling front.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Fusion
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/add170
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-device analysis of energy loss duration and pellet penetration with implications for shattered pellet injection in ITER

O. Ficker, S. Gerasimov, S. Silburn, P. Heinrich et al.
2 citations
Nuclear Fusion
Magnetic confinement fusion research
3.74
article

Multi-device analysis of energy loss duration and pellet penetration with implications for shattered pellet injection in ITER

O. Ficker, S. Gerasimov, S. Silburn, P. Heinrich, V. Kachkanov, G. Papp, Zhongyong Chen, I. Coffey, H.J. Sun, N.W. Eidietis, G.M. Bodner, J. L. Herfindal, C. Reux, M. Lehnen, U. Sheikh, Jayhyun Kim, S. Jachmich
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract A robust disruption mitigation system (DMS) requires accurate characterization of key disruption timescales, one of the most notable being the thermal quench (TQ). Recent modeling of shattered pellet injection (SPI) into ITER plasmas, using JOREK and INDEX, suggests long TQ durations (6–10 ms) and slow cold front propagation due to the large plasma size. If validated, these predictions would have an impact on the desired pellet parameters and mitigation strategies for the ITER DMS. To resolve these questions, a database of SPI experiments from several small-to-large sized devices (J-TEXT, KSTAR, AUG, DIII-D, and JET) has been compiled under the auspices of the International Tokamak Physics Activity MHD, disruptions, and control topical group. Analysis of the energy loss duration (proxy for the TQ duration) with machine size is presented for both mixed neon/deuterium (Ne/D) SPI and pure deuterium (D) SPI. Several metrics for the energy loss onset (e.g. soft x-ray signal drop, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>I</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> dip, and radiation flash) were considered as the conventional metric, electron cyclotron emission, is often cut-off during SPI. Several scalings with different onset metrics showed an increase in energy loss duration with machine size. The energy loss duration was additionally shown to be a function of the ratio between the number of SPI neon atoms injected and the stored energy. Analysis of the pellet shard position relative to the cold front found that in larger devices, pellets are typically found inboard of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> surface at the energy loss onset. Lastly, the delay between the pellet shards hitting the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> surface and the energy loss onset was additionally found to increase with machine size. This suggests that the pellet shards in large devices will penetrate faster and further than the cooling front.

Nuclear FusionVol. 65(6)
ITER (FR), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KR), CEA Cadarache (FR), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plasma Physics (CZ), Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (DE), Wuhan University of Science and Technology (CN), United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (GB), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), General Atomics (United States) (US)
EUROfusion, Fusion Energy Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
3.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.