Effect of Feeding Soybean Hay on Growth Performance, Feed Intake and Nutrient Utilization of Yearling Local Sheep

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of soybean hay supplementation on growth performance, feed intake, and nutrient utilization in local sheep fed grass hay as a basal diet. Twenty-five yearling intact male local sheep were assigned to five dietary treatments in a completely randomized block design: 100% concentrate (+ve control; T1), 75% concentrate + 25% soybean hay (T2), 50% concentrate + 50% soybean hay (T3), 25% concentrate + 75% soybean hay (T4), and 100% soybean hay (T5). The study lasted 90 days, followed by a 7 day digestibility trial. Dry matter intake did not differ significantly (P>0.05) among treatments, with values ranging from 939.06 to 1,049.19 g/day. Organic matter intake was significantly higher (P<0.05) in T1, T2, T3, and T4 compared to T5. Soybean hay inclusion exceeding 50% resulted in significantly greater ash intake (P<0.001). Crude protein (CP) intake was highest in T1 (84.82–109.56 g/day; P<0.01), while T1, T3, and T4 exhibited higher digestible CP and metabolic body weight (P<0.05) than T2 and T5. Apparent CP digestibility was significantly higher (P<0.01) in T1 and T3 compared to T2, T4, and T5. Final body weight and average daily gain were significantly higher (P<0.05) in T1, T3, and T4 compared to T2 and T5. T1, T2, T3, and T4 also showed significantly greater total body weight gain and feed conversion efficiency than T5 (P<0.05). Economic analysis revealed marginal rates of return of 1.21 for T3 and 1.51 for T4, both exceeding the minimum acceptable rate for farmers. Considering both growth performance and economic feasibility, T1 (100% concentrate) and T4 (25% concentrate + 75% soybean hay) are recommended as viable supplementation strategies to enhance sheep productivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology
Published
2025-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v13i4.874-881.7246
Primary Topic
Agricultural Systems and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Feeding Soybean Hay on Growth Performance, Feed Intake and Nutrient Utilization of Yearling Local Sheep

Shambel Kiros Simone, Solomon Tiruneh, Abito Asres, Molla Bishaw Desale et al.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology
Agricultural Systems and Practices
article

Effect of Feeding Soybean Hay on Growth Performance, Feed Intake and Nutrient Utilization of Yearling Local Sheep

Shambel Kiros Simone, Solomon Tiruneh, Abito Asres, Molla Bishaw Desale, Getasew Esayase, Derese Tekle, Tesfa Molla
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of soybean hay supplementation on growth performance, feed intake, and nutrient utilization in local sheep fed grass hay as a basal diet. Twenty-five yearling intact male local sheep were assigned to five dietary treatments in a completely randomized block design: 100% concentrate (+ve control; T1), 75% concentrate + 25% soybean hay (T2), 50% concentrate + 50% soybean hay (T3), 25% concentrate + 75% soybean hay (T4), and 100% soybean hay (T5). The study lasted 90 days, followed by a 7 day digestibility trial. Dry matter intake did not differ significantly (P>0.05) among treatments, with values ranging from 939.06 to 1,049.19 g/day. Organic matter intake was significantly higher (P<0.05) in T1, T2, T3, and T4 compared to T5. Soybean hay inclusion exceeding 50% resulted in significantly greater ash intake (P<0.001). Crude protein (CP) intake was highest in T1 (84.82–109.56 g/day; P<0.01), while T1, T3, and T4 exhibited higher digestible CP and metabolic body weight (P<0.05) than T2 and T5. Apparent CP digestibility was significantly higher (P<0.01) in T1 and T3 compared to T2, T4, and T5. Final body weight and average daily gain were significantly higher (P<0.05) in T1, T3, and T4 compared to T2 and T5. T1, T2, T3, and T4 also showed significantly greater total body weight gain and feed conversion efficiency than T5 (P<0.05). Economic analysis revealed marginal rates of return of 1.21 for T3 and 1.51 for T4, both exceeding the minimum acceptable rate for farmers. Considering both growth performance and economic feasibility, T1 (100% concentrate) and T4 (25% concentrate + 75% soybean hay) are recommended as viable supplementation strategies to enhance sheep productivity.

Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and TechnologyVol. 13(4)
Amhara Agricultural Research Institute (ET), Agricultural Research Center (EG), Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Agricultural Systems and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.