Evaluating Gas Hydrate Production Methods and Field Development in the Krishna Godavari Basin: A Geophysical and Computational Approach

Abstract This study investigates the production performance of gas hydrate-bearing reservoirs using a full-field reservoir model developed through geostatistical and dynamic simulations. The model integrates stratigraphic and petrophysical properties derived from well-log data and evaluates production scenarios under varying operational conditions, including the influence of aquifer drive. Depressurization is identified as the primary production mechanism, and its impact on gas hydrate dissociation and methane recovery is analyzed across multiple wells (e.g., NGHP-02-16A, 17A, 20A, 23A, and 24A). The results highlight significant variability in production performance due to reservoir heterogeneity. NGHP-02-24A achieves the highest cumulative gas recovery (243 million m³) and, NGHP-02-20A exhibits the lowest cumulative recovery (75.3 million m3), underscoring the need for tailored strategies to enhance performance. Simulations further reveal that aquifer-driven production significantly improves gas recovery, with cumulative recovery reaching 3716.7 million m3 with a significant increment in water production, compared to 661.73 million m3 without aquifer support. The investigation signifies that the location (Area B) has significant potential for commercial development with NGHP-02-16A as the best location to develop a field development plan for field trials. Location-specific investigations incorporating geomechanical impacts are essential to refine predictions and optimize reservoir management strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Offshore Technology Conference
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4043/35843-ms
Primary Topic
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Gas Hydrate Production Methods and Field Development in the Krishna Godavari Basin: A Geophysical and Computational Approach

D. Gobichandhru, S. Ramesh, R. Vivek
Offshore Technology Conference
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
article

Evaluating Gas Hydrate Production Methods and Field Development in the Krishna Godavari Basin: A Geophysical and Computational Approach

D. Gobichandhru, S. Ramesh, R. Vivek
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the production performance of gas hydrate-bearing reservoirs using a full-field reservoir model developed through geostatistical and dynamic simulations. The model integrates stratigraphic and petrophysical properties derived from well-log data and evaluates production scenarios under varying operational conditions, including the influence of aquifer drive. Depressurization is identified as the primary production mechanism, and its impact on gas hydrate dissociation and methane recovery is analyzed across multiple wells (e.g., NGHP-02-16A, 17A, 20A, 23A, and 24A). The results highlight significant variability in production performance due to reservoir heterogeneity. NGHP-02-24A achieves the highest cumulative gas recovery (243 million m³) and, NGHP-02-20A exhibits the lowest cumulative recovery (75.3 million m3), underscoring the need for tailored strategies to enhance performance. Simulations further reveal that aquifer-driven production significantly improves gas recovery, with cumulative recovery reaching 3716.7 million m3 with a significant increment in water production, compared to 661.73 million m3 without aquifer support. The investigation signifies that the location (Area B) has significant potential for commercial development with NGHP-02-16A as the best location to develop a field development plan for field trials. Location-specific investigations incorporating geomechanical impacts are essential to refine predictions and optimize reservoir management strategies.

Offshore Technology Conference
National Institute of Ocean Technology (IN), Pandit Deendayal Energy University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.