Experimental Investigation of the Eccentric Performance of Columns Reinforced by Steel and GFRP Bars and Strengthened with GFRP NSM Bars and Mat Techniques

Abstract An experimental program was conducted to study the eccentric behavior of columns reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP), steel bars, or a hybrid of both. Two strengthening methods were employed: GFRP mats and near surface-mounted (NSM) GFRP bars. Eighteen specimens with different reinforcement configurations, all having slenderness ratios 19, were tested under axial compression loads with eccentricities of 0.0 mm, 30 mm, and 60 mm. Results showed that using GFRP bars as longitudinal reinforcement significantly decreased the axial bearing capacity as eccentricity increased, with reductions of about 43% at 30 mm and 71% at 60 mm without additional strengthening. Specimens strengthened with three layers of GFRP mats exhibited reductions of approximately 35% and 56% at the same eccentricities, while a combination of GFRP mats and NSM bars showed reductions of 19% and 49%. At zero eccentricity, NSM GFRP rebars combined with GFRP wrap increased the loading capacity by about 10% and enhanced ductility by approximately 54%. Combining NSM GFRP rebars and GFRP wrap can significantly increase the loading capacity and improve displacement ductility. The obtained results show that these specimens outperform others. For example, the axial load is increased by 10% at e = 0, by 56% at e = 30, and by 93% at e = 60 compared to the control specimens. The elastic stiffness was comparable for columns reinforced with GFRP and steel. Using GFRP for longitudinal reinforcement and steel for stirrups resulted in a 16% reduction in axial load and a 22% reduction in axial displacement. The strengthening techniques proved more effective as the loading eccentricity approached the P–M curve’s equilibrium point.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-025-00773-5
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Investigation of the Eccentric Performance of Columns Reinforced by Steel and GFRP Bars and Strengthened with GFRP NSM Bars and Mat Techniques

Mahmoud Zaghlal, Ahmed A. Elakhras, Mohamed Yones, Seleem S. E. Ahmad et al.
2 citations
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
2.01
article

Experimental Investigation of the Eccentric Performance of Columns Reinforced by Steel and GFRP Bars and Strengthened with GFRP NSM Bars and Mat Techniques

Mahmoud Zaghlal, Ahmed A. Elakhras, Mohamed Yones, Seleem S. E. Ahmad, Hesham Elemam
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract An experimental program was conducted to study the eccentric behavior of columns reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP), steel bars, or a hybrid of both. Two strengthening methods were employed: GFRP mats and near surface-mounted (NSM) GFRP bars. Eighteen specimens with different reinforcement configurations, all having slenderness ratios 19, were tested under axial compression loads with eccentricities of 0.0 mm, 30 mm, and 60 mm. Results showed that using GFRP bars as longitudinal reinforcement significantly decreased the axial bearing capacity as eccentricity increased, with reductions of about 43% at 30 mm and 71% at 60 mm without additional strengthening. Specimens strengthened with three layers of GFRP mats exhibited reductions of approximately 35% and 56% at the same eccentricities, while a combination of GFRP mats and NSM bars showed reductions of 19% and 49%. At zero eccentricity, NSM GFRP rebars combined with GFRP wrap increased the loading capacity by about 10% and enhanced ductility by approximately 54%. Combining NSM GFRP rebars and GFRP wrap can significantly increase the loading capacity and improve displacement ductility. The obtained results show that these specimens outperform others. For example, the axial load is increased by 10% at e = 0, by 56% at e = 30, and by 93% at e = 60 compared to the control specimens. The elastic stiffness was comparable for columns reinforced with GFRP and steel. Using GFRP for longitudinal reinforcement and steel for stirrups resulted in a 16% reduction in axial load and a 22% reduction in axial displacement. The strengthening techniques proved more effective as the loading eccentricity approached the P–M curve’s equilibrium point.

International Journal of Concrete Structures and MaterialsVol. 19(1)
Zagazig University (EG), University of Missouri (US)
Science and Technology Development Fund, Zagazig University
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.