Brazilian study highlights replication struggles

Fifty-six laboratories across Brazil have attempted to complete 96 replications total, covering 47 experiments in a bid to quantify how reproducible biomedical research is in the country. The experiments included reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions, colorimetric assays, and behavioral assays for rodents. According to the study results , which were posted on the preprint server bioRxiv in April, 6 years after the effort was initially announced , only 15–45% of the experiments were found to be reproducible, says study coauthor Olavo Amaral, a metascience researcher at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. “I am worried about that,” Amaral says, pointing out that solid science is difficult to build on if the literature is so difficult to verify. He notes that his results aren’t much different from those of previous replication efforts in the biomedical sciences . “I don’t think we have a number to compare whether our local reality

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
C&EN Global Enterprise
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/cen-10311-scicon4
Primary Topic
Biotechnology and Related Fields
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brazilian study highlights replication struggles

special to C EN Dalmeet Singh Chawla
C&EN Global Enterprise
Biotechnology and Related Fields
article

Brazilian study highlights replication struggles

special to C EN Dalmeet Singh Chawla
article en

Abstract

Fifty-six laboratories across Brazil have attempted to complete 96 replications total, covering 47 experiments in a bid to quantify how reproducible biomedical research is in the country. The experiments included reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions, colorimetric assays, and behavioral assays for rodents. According to the study results , which were posted on the preprint server bioRxiv in April, 6 years after the effort was initially announced , only 15–45% of the experiments were found to be reproducible, says study coauthor Olavo Amaral, a metascience researcher at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. “I am worried about that,” Amaral says, pointing out that solid science is difficult to build on if the literature is so difficult to verify. He notes that his results aren’t much different from those of previous replication efforts in the biomedical sciences . “I don’t think we have a number to compare whether our local reality

C&EN Global EnterpriseVol. 103(11)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Biotechnology and Related Fields
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.