Researchers find weaknesses in AlphaFold 3

The artificial intelligence–based structure-prediction software AlphaFold, originally developed by Google DeepMind, has quickly become an important tool for drug discovery. One of the improvements in its newest iteration, AlphaFold 3, which DeepMind made together with its drug-discovery spin-off Isomorphic Labs, is more-accurate structure predictions for protein and nucleic acid complexes. But when U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology researchers Christina Bergonzo and Alexander Grishaev put AlphaFold 3 to the test, they discovered that there are cases where the tool’s predictions don’t match experimentally determined structures ( J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2024, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5c00245). The researchers asked the program to predict the structures of a number of RNA and DNA sequences, with some of the RNA sequences coordinated to metal ions. They also selected two sequences—each with structures that change dramatically with a single mutation—and asked AlphaFold to predict the structures before and after each mutation. The researchers compared those

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
C&EN Global Enterprise
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/cen-10311-scicon1
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Researchers find weaknesses in AlphaFold 3

special to C EN Sam Lemonick
C&EN Global Enterprise
Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
article

Researchers find weaknesses in AlphaFold 3

special to C EN Sam Lemonick
article en

Abstract

The artificial intelligence–based structure-prediction software AlphaFold, originally developed by Google DeepMind, has quickly become an important tool for drug discovery. One of the improvements in its newest iteration, AlphaFold 3, which DeepMind made together with its drug-discovery spin-off Isomorphic Labs, is more-accurate structure predictions for protein and nucleic acid complexes. But when U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology researchers Christina Bergonzo and Alexander Grishaev put AlphaFold 3 to the test, they discovered that there are cases where the tool’s predictions don’t match experimentally determined structures ( J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2024, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5c00245). The researchers asked the program to predict the structures of a number of RNA and DNA sequences, with some of the RNA sequences coordinated to metal ions. They also selected two sequences—each with structures that change dramatically with a single mutation—and asked AlphaFold to predict the structures before and after each mutation. The researchers compared those

C&EN Global EnterpriseVol. 103(11)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.