A quantitative approach to decoding pottery technology: Confocal microscopy applied to the traceological and textural analysis of surface treatment

• Traceological analysis focused on understanding technological processes of pottery manufacture. • Creation of a specific experimental reference collection for surface treatments on handmade pottery. • Qualitative and quantitative characterisation of traces and surface appearance. • Surface topography was measured using confocal microscopy to classify trace types based on their morphology, typology, and nature. Among the various phases of pottery production and use that can be examined through traceological analysis, surface treatment remains one of the least explored. Understanding certain phases of past production processes through material remains often necessitates the establishment of reference frameworks that facilitate the identification and characterization of the actions responsible for their formation. In this context, experimental archaeology provides a means to reconstruct the relationships between the archaeological record and past technological practices. This study proposes an experimental program focused on the surface treatment of pottery and the tools employed in these processes, with a primary emphasis on the categories of tools utilized in the production of prehistoric handmade ceramics. The central hypothesis posits that distinct tools generate distinguishable surface traces. To systematically document and characterize the traces produced by various tool types—including pebbles, flint spatulas, pottery spatulas, shell spatulas, linen rags, grass, and leather—a comprehensive catalogue has been compiled. This catalogue integrates visual documentation with qualitative data on surface traces and overall appearance. Additionally, confocal microscopy was tested as a means to quantitatively assess the visual differences observed between distinct surface treatments. The findings indicate that confocal microscopy is both a precise and accessible technique for measuring surface microtexture. The results underscore the methodological potential for traceological and textural analysis of ceramic surface treatments. The ability to differentiate between various surface treatment techniques offers new avenues for the study of prehistoric pottery, enhancing our understanding of ancient ceramic production practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Archaeological Science Reports
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105152
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A quantitative approach to decoding pottery technology: Confocal microscopy applied to the traceological and textural analysis of surface treatment

Niccolò Mazzucco, Sara Díaz Bonilla
Journal of Archaeological Science Reports
Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
article

A quantitative approach to decoding pottery technology: Confocal microscopy applied to the traceological and textural analysis of surface treatment

Niccolò Mazzucco, Sara Díaz Bonilla
article en

Abstract

• Traceological analysis focused on understanding technological processes of pottery manufacture. • Creation of a specific experimental reference collection for surface treatments on handmade pottery. • Qualitative and quantitative characterisation of traces and surface appearance. • Surface topography was measured using confocal microscopy to classify trace types based on their morphology, typology, and nature. Among the various phases of pottery production and use that can be examined through traceological analysis, surface treatment remains one of the least explored. Understanding certain phases of past production processes through material remains often necessitates the establishment of reference frameworks that facilitate the identification and characterization of the actions responsible for their formation. In this context, experimental archaeology provides a means to reconstruct the relationships between the archaeological record and past technological practices. This study proposes an experimental program focused on the surface treatment of pottery and the tools employed in these processes, with a primary emphasis on the categories of tools utilized in the production of prehistoric handmade ceramics. The central hypothesis posits that distinct tools generate distinguishable surface traces. To systematically document and characterize the traces produced by various tool types—including pebbles, flint spatulas, pottery spatulas, shell spatulas, linen rags, grass, and leather—a comprehensive catalogue has been compiled. This catalogue integrates visual documentation with qualitative data on surface traces and overall appearance. Additionally, confocal microscopy was tested as a means to quantitatively assess the visual differences observed between distinct surface treatments. The findings indicate that confocal microscopy is both a precise and accessible technique for measuring surface microtexture. The results underscore the methodological potential for traceological and textural analysis of ceramic surface treatments. The ability to differentiate between various surface treatment techniques offers new avenues for the study of prehistoric pottery, enhancing our understanding of ancient ceramic production practices.

Journal of Archaeological Science ReportsVol. 64
University of Pisa (IT), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.