Understanding the nomological network of red tape: Synthesis and research agenda

Due to the exponential increase of publications about red tape over the past two decades, an integrative review is needed to lay the jigsaw puzzle on empirical red tape research and identify blind spots in the literature. This study addresses this issue by reviewing 139 empirical studies across social science disciplines and mapping the nomological network of red tape (i.e. antecedents, measurements, outcomes, moderators and mediators). Findings indicate several blind spots, namely a lack of studies from the Global South, from non-local government organizations (including companies and nonprofits), and using comparative, multilevel, qualitative, or mixed-method designs. A range of antecedents, moderators and mediators at the individual, organizational, institutional and across levels are also identified. In conclusion, a nomological network is constructed and a research agenda is formulated aimed at understanding the complex causalities surrounding red tape, and the impact specific conditions have on its emergence or consequences.<br/><br/>© 2025 The Author(s)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Public Management Journal
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2025.2482599
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the nomological network of red tape: Synthesis and research agenda

Qianhui Li, Bert George
3 citations
International Public Management Journal
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
6.68
article

Understanding the nomological network of red tape: Synthesis and research agenda

Qianhui Li, Bert George
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Due to the exponential increase of publications about red tape over the past two decades, an integrative review is needed to lay the jigsaw puzzle on empirical red tape research and identify blind spots in the literature. This study addresses this issue by reviewing 139 empirical studies across social science disciplines and mapping the nomological network of red tape (i.e. antecedents, measurements, outcomes, moderators and mediators). Findings indicate several blind spots, namely a lack of studies from the Global South, from non-local government organizations (including companies and nonprofits), and using comparative, multilevel, qualitative, or mixed-method designs. A range of antecedents, moderators and mediators at the individual, organizational, institutional and across levels are also identified. In conclusion, a nomological network is constructed and a research agenda is formulated aimed at understanding the complex causalities surrounding red tape, and the impact specific conditions have on its emergence or consequences.<br/><br/>© 2025 The Author(s)

International Public Management JournalVol. 28(6)
City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
6.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.