Novel Molecular Biomarkers to Guide Treatment Decision-making in Metastatic Urothelial Cancer—A Patient Cohort Analysis

The current options and recent developments in the field of systemic therapy for advanced urothelial cancer (UC) patients urge the need for selection criteria to identify the most optimal therapeutic option for individual patients. The molecular makeup of tumors, including molecular subtype, tumor microenvironment composition, and gene mutations, fusions, and amplifications, has previously been correlated with a response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, erdafitinib, or enfortumab vedotin (EV) monotherapy, and may withhold potential candidate biomarkers. In this study, we aimed to stratify metastatic UC (mUC) patients based on molecular biomarkers that might be associated with a response to EV, a fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor, or anti-PD-(L)1, by using whole-genome DNA-sequencing and paired RNA-sequencing data of fresh-frozen metastatic tumor biopsies of 155 mUC patients. We observed that NECTIN4 amplification, FGFR2/3 mutations, and the RNA expression-based T-cell-to-stroma enrichment (TSE) score were mutually exclusive, and may therefore reflect biologically distinct tumors and sensitivity to treatments. This finding was validated in two independent bladder cohorts: the IMvigor210 study and The Cancer Genome Atlas. Stratification of patients into subgroups based on these molecular features is possible. Our data challenge the concept of a one-treatment-fits-all paradigm and support the rationale for prospective clinical trials with biomarker-guided treatment selection of mUC patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Urology Oncology
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.007
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Novel Molecular Biomarkers to Guide Treatment Decision-making in Metastatic Urothelial Cancer—A Patient Cohort Analysis

Youssra Salhi, Michiel S. van der Heijden, Niven Mehra, Ronald de Wit et al.
2 citations
European Urology Oncology
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
4.01
article

Novel Molecular Biomarkers to Guide Treatment Decision-making in Metastatic Urothelial Cancer—A Patient Cohort Analysis

Youssra Salhi, Michiel S. van der Heijden, Niven Mehra, Ronald de Wit, Paul Hamberg, Hans M. Westgeest, John W.M. Martens, J. Alberto Nakauma-González, Reno Debets, Joost L. Boormans, Maureen J.B. Aarts, Debbie Robbrecht, Jens Voortman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The current options and recent developments in the field of systemic therapy for advanced urothelial cancer (UC) patients urge the need for selection criteria to identify the most optimal therapeutic option for individual patients. The molecular makeup of tumors, including molecular subtype, tumor microenvironment composition, and gene mutations, fusions, and amplifications, has previously been correlated with a response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, erdafitinib, or enfortumab vedotin (EV) monotherapy, and may withhold potential candidate biomarkers. In this study, we aimed to stratify metastatic UC (mUC) patients based on molecular biomarkers that might be associated with a response to EV, a fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor, or anti-PD-(L)1, by using whole-genome DNA-sequencing and paired RNA-sequencing data of fresh-frozen metastatic tumor biopsies of 155 mUC patients. We observed that NECTIN4 amplification, FGFR2/3 mutations, and the RNA expression-based T-cell-to-stroma enrichment (TSE) score were mutually exclusive, and may therefore reflect biologically distinct tumors and sensitivity to treatments. This finding was validated in two independent bladder cohorts: the IMvigor210 study and The Cancer Genome Atlas. Stratification of patients into subgroups based on these molecular features is possible. Our data challenge the concept of a one-treatment-fits-all paradigm and support the rationale for prospective clinical trials with biomarker-guided treatment selection of mUC patients.

European Urology OncologyVol. 9(1)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Sint Franciscus Gasthuis (NL), Amphia Ziekenhuis (NL), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL), Franciscus Vlietland (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
4.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.