Exploring Practices, Challenges, and Design Implications for Citation Foraging, Management, and Synthesis
Citations play a crucial role in reinforcing knowledge construction, sparking new ideas, and fostering science communication.However, researchers often encounter difficulties in foraging, managing, and synthesizing citations amid the rapid growth of academic publications.To better understand researchers' practices and challenges in citation related activities, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 researchers in the fields of HCI and AI.Our key findings include: (1) researchers are unable to fully track and digest all relevant work; (2) current citation management tools fall short of meeting researchers' needs; (3) "cherry-picking" (write the statement first, then search for supporting references to strengthen its credibility and accuracy) is a common practice in citation synthesis; and (4) citation foraging, management, and synthesis workflows are disconnected and lack consistency.Our design implications provide insight into the development of interactive systems that more effectively support researchers in their citation activities.
Authors
- Sylvain Malacria (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5201-5875)
- Anran Xu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1790-7859)
- Koji Yatani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4192-0420)
- Xinrui Fang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5444-8722)
Institutions
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Université de Lille (FR)
- Intelligent Systems Research (United States) (US)
- École Centrale de Lille (FR)
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-04-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3706599.3719883
- Primary Topic
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science