Exploring Practices, Challenges, and Design Implications for Citation Foraging, Management, and Synthesis

Citations play a crucial role in reinforcing knowledge construction, sparking new ideas, and fostering science communication.However, researchers often encounter difficulties in foraging, managing, and synthesizing citations amid the rapid growth of academic publications.To better understand researchers' practices and challenges in citation related activities, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 researchers in the fields of HCI and AI.Our key findings include: (1) researchers are unable to fully track and digest all relevant work; (2) current citation management tools fall short of meeting researchers' needs; (3) "cherry-picking" (write the statement first, then search for supporting references to strengthen its credibility and accuracy) is a common practice in citation synthesis; and (4) citation foraging, management, and synthesis workflows are disconnected and lack consistency.Our design implications provide insight into the development of interactive systems that more effectively support researchers in their citation activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706599.3719883
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Practices, Challenges, and Design Implications for Citation Foraging, Management, and Synthesis

Sylvain Malacria, Anran Xu, Koji Yatani, Xinrui Fang
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Exploring Practices, Challenges, and Design Implications for Citation Foraging, Management, and Synthesis

Sylvain Malacria, Anran Xu, Koji Yatani, Xinrui Fang
article en

Abstract

Citations play a crucial role in reinforcing knowledge construction, sparking new ideas, and fostering science communication.However, researchers often encounter difficulties in foraging, managing, and synthesizing citations amid the rapid growth of academic publications.To better understand researchers' practices and challenges in citation related activities, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 researchers in the fields of HCI and AI.Our key findings include: (1) researchers are unable to fully track and digest all relevant work; (2) current citation management tools fall short of meeting researchers' needs; (3) "cherry-picking" (write the statement first, then search for supporting references to strengthen its credibility and accuracy) is a common practice in citation synthesis; and (4) citation foraging, management, and synthesis workflows are disconnected and lack consistency.Our design implications provide insight into the development of interactive systems that more effectively support researchers in their citation activities.

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Lille (FR), Intelligent Systems Research (United States) (US), École Centrale de Lille (FR), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.