Optimization Strategies for Integrating an Ejector into a Two-Stage Vapor Compression Refrigeration System

To further investigate how to optimize the coefficient of performance (COP) of a two-stage compression refrigeration system, this paper focuses on process optimization and theoretical calculations for an incomplete intercooling two-stage compression refrigeration cycle using refrigerant R410A. The model established for the ejector system was validated, showing an average calculation error of approximately 6%, indicating good agreement with the simulations. The study compared changes in the COP and ejector coefficient under variations in factors such as subcooling in the intercooler, superheating in the heat exchanger, and intermediate pressure. The ejector coefficient showed a maximum change of 72%, while the COP varied by up to 52%. Additionally, by comparing the refrigeration system with and without the ejector, it was found that the COP could be improved by up to 215%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of industry and engineering management.
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62517/jiem.202403309
Primary Topic
Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization Strategies for Integrating an Ejector into a Two-Stage Vapor Compression Refrigeration System

Pengyu Xie, Weixue Jiang
1 links
Journal of industry and engineering management.
Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
article

Optimization Strategies for Integrating an Ejector into a Two-Stage Vapor Compression Refrigeration System

Pengyu Xie, Weixue Jiang
article en

Abstract

To further investigate how to optimize the coefficient of performance (COP) of a two-stage compression refrigeration system, this paper focuses on process optimization and theoretical calculations for an incomplete intercooling two-stage compression refrigeration cycle using refrigerant R410A. The model established for the ejector system was validated, showing an average calculation error of approximately 6%, indicating good agreement with the simulations. The study compared changes in the COP and ejector coefficient under variations in factors such as subcooling in the intercooler, superheating in the heat exchanger, and intermediate pressure. The ejector coefficient showed a maximum change of 72%, while the COP varied by up to 52%. Additionally, by comparing the refrigeration system with and without the ejector, it was found that the COP could be improved by up to 215%.

Journal of industry and engineering management.Vol. 2(3)
Yangzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.