A New Method for the Quantification of Ethyl Sulfate and Isopropyl Sulfate Contents in Abacavir Sulfate by Ion Chromatography

A predictable new method was developed and validated for the determination of ethyl sulfate (EtS) and isopropyl sulfate (IprS) contents in abacavir sulfate (ABS) drug substance by ion chromatography (IC). Ethyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol and sulfuric acids were used in the manufacturing process of ABS. Therefore, there is a possibility to form respective sulfate impurities, i.e., EtSs and IprSs. Hence, a control strategy is required for EtS and IprS contents in ABS. Chromatographic separation of EtS and IprS contents in Abacavir sulfate was achieved on Metrosep A Supp 10 (250 mm × 4.0 mm) column and particles of 4.6 μm size. The mobile phase consists of buffer (3.2 mM Sodium carbonate and 1.0 mM of sodium bicarbonate) and acetonitrile in the ratio of 90:10 (v/v) with the flow rate of 0.6 mL min-1 by applying 30°C column oven temperature. The analytes were monitored by conductometric detector. The performance of the method was assessed by evaluating the specificity, linearity, sensitivity, precision, robustness and accuracy experiments. The limit of detection and limit of quantification values for EtS were 0.3 and 0.8 μg mL-1 and for IprS were 0.3 and 0.8 μg mL-1, respectively. The correlation co-efficient value of linearity experiment was 0.9999 for EtS, 0.9998 for IprS. The average recovery for EtS was 98.7% and for IprS was 100.9%. The method is robust for EtS and IprS contents and also specific from other common anions, i.e., chloride, bromide, nitrate, sulfate, methyl sulfate and methanesulfonic acids. The results proved that the validated method was simple and cost-effective for controlling EtS and IprS contents in ABS drug substance, and the method can be successfully applied in the quality control analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chromatographic Science
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/bmaf023
Primary Topic
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A New Method for the Quantification of Ethyl Sulfate and Isopropyl Sulfate Contents in Abacavir Sulfate by Ion Chromatography

Surendra Babu Manabolu Surya, Naresh Kumar Katari, Narendra Kumar Masani, Hemant Sharma et al.
1 links
Journal of Chromatographic Science
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
article

A New Method for the Quantification of Ethyl Sulfate and Isopropyl Sulfate Contents in Abacavir Sulfate by Ion Chromatography

Surendra Babu Manabolu Surya, Naresh Kumar Katari, Narendra Kumar Masani, Hemant Sharma, Venkata Ramana Reddy Junuthula, Chandrasekhar Reddy Kandati
article en

Abstract

A predictable new method was developed and validated for the determination of ethyl sulfate (EtS) and isopropyl sulfate (IprS) contents in abacavir sulfate (ABS) drug substance by ion chromatography (IC). Ethyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol and sulfuric acids were used in the manufacturing process of ABS. Therefore, there is a possibility to form respective sulfate impurities, i.e., EtSs and IprSs. Hence, a control strategy is required for EtS and IprS contents in ABS. Chromatographic separation of EtS and IprS contents in Abacavir sulfate was achieved on Metrosep A Supp 10 (250 mm × 4.0 mm) column and particles of 4.6 μm size. The mobile phase consists of buffer (3.2 mM Sodium carbonate and 1.0 mM of sodium bicarbonate) and acetonitrile in the ratio of 90:10 (v/v) with the flow rate of 0.6 mL min-1 by applying 30°C column oven temperature. The analytes were monitored by conductometric detector. The performance of the method was assessed by evaluating the specificity, linearity, sensitivity, precision, robustness and accuracy experiments. The limit of detection and limit of quantification values for EtS were 0.3 and 0.8 μg mL-1 and for IprS were 0.3 and 0.8 μg mL-1, respectively. The correlation co-efficient value of linearity experiment was 0.9999 for EtS, 0.9998 for IprS. The average recovery for EtS was 98.7% and for IprS was 100.9%. The method is robust for EtS and IprS contents and also specific from other common anions, i.e., chloride, bromide, nitrate, sulfate, methyl sulfate and methanesulfonic acids. The results proved that the validated method was simple and cost-effective for controlling EtS and IprS contents in ABS drug substance, and the method can be successfully applied in the quality control analysis.

Journal of Chromatographic ScienceVol. 63(4)
Indra (Spain) (ES), Aurobindo Pharma (India) (IN), GITAM University (IN), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.