Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate 1.5T and 3T

With its excellent display of soft tissues and the possibilities of three-dimensional display, magnetic resonance has become one of the fundamental diagnostics in the display of prostate and its pathological conditions since its beginnings 40 years ago. Although there is greater availability of devices for magnetic resonance with a field strength of 1.5T, the recommendation of the European Association of Urogenital Radiologists is that imaging of the prostate with magnetic resonance is performed on devices with a field strength of 3T. 3T devices were introduced due to the increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which can be used to shorten recording time or increase resolution, i.e. improve image quality. There is more and more research into the application of quantitative techniques such as Magnetic resonance fingerprinting, T2 mapping, BOLD, which could improve the detection and quantification of prostate cancer lesions, and by optimizing the protocol at 1.5T and 3T it is possible to perform exam of equal diagnostic value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiološki vjesnik
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55378/rv.49.1.5
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate 1.5T and 3T

Krešimir Dolić, Goran Kutlić
Radiološki vjesnik
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate 1.5T and 3T

Krešimir Dolić, Goran Kutlić
article en

Abstract

With its excellent display of soft tissues and the possibilities of three-dimensional display, magnetic resonance has become one of the fundamental diagnostics in the display of prostate and its pathological conditions since its beginnings 40 years ago. Although there is greater availability of devices for magnetic resonance with a field strength of 1.5T, the recommendation of the European Association of Urogenital Radiologists is that imaging of the prostate with magnetic resonance is performed on devices with a field strength of 3T. 3T devices were introduced due to the increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which can be used to shorten recording time or increase resolution, i.e. improve image quality. There is more and more research into the application of quantitative techniques such as Magnetic resonance fingerprinting, T2 mapping, BOLD, which could improve the detection and quantification of prostate cancer lesions, and by optimizing the protocol at 1.5T and 3T it is possible to perform exam of equal diagnostic value.

Radiološki vjesnikVol. 49(1)
University of Split (HR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate 1.5T and 3T — Krešimir Dolić, Goran Kutlić · Radiološki vjesnik (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS