The Development and Testing of an Assessment Scale for Insufficiencies in Family Resilience

<b>Background and purpose:</b> When a family becomes aware of family symptoms, family resilience is defined as its power to autonomously and actively improve its own family functions. A quantitative assessment of family resilience is essential in the practice of family nursing. The purpose of this study was to develop a self-assessment scale for family resilience based on the theoretical foundation of the Concentric Sphere Family Environment Theory (CSFET), and to examine the scale's reliability and validity. <b>Methods:</b> Based on 23 categories obtained from previous studies clarifying family conditions demonstrating family resilience, the Assessment Scale for Insufficiencies in Family Resilience (IFR), consisting of 21 items, was developed through content validity examinations by an expert committee and through face validity examinations for family members. The reliability and validity of the IFR were examined for families with children or with family members requiring care. <b>Results:</b> Temporal stability over a 2-week interval, which was assessed in 26 subjects, was supported by a high and significant correlation coefficient. The following statistical analysis was performed based on the responses of 206 subjects. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient showed high internal consistency reliability. The total IFR score showed a moderately significant correlation with the family function score and the family support demands score, demonstrating acceptable criterion-related validity. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the fit of a five-factor model based on the five systems of CSFET, and construct validity was supported. <b>Conclusions:</b> The reliability and validity of the IFR, which is composed of five factors and 21 items based on the CSFET, were confirmed, making the IFR a viable self-assessment scale for determining the level of family resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Reports
Published
2025-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15050145
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Development and Testing of an Assessment Scale for Insufficiencies in Family Resilience

Natsumi Kijima, Naohiro Hohashi
1 citations
Nursing Reports
Resilience and Mental Health
2.31
article

The Development and Testing of an Assessment Scale for Insufficiencies in Family Resilience

Natsumi Kijima, Naohiro Hohashi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background and purpose:</b> When a family becomes aware of family symptoms, family resilience is defined as its power to autonomously and actively improve its own family functions. A quantitative assessment of family resilience is essential in the practice of family nursing. The purpose of this study was to develop a self-assessment scale for family resilience based on the theoretical foundation of the Concentric Sphere Family Environment Theory (CSFET), and to examine the scale's reliability and validity. <b>Methods:</b> Based on 23 categories obtained from previous studies clarifying family conditions demonstrating family resilience, the Assessment Scale for Insufficiencies in Family Resilience (IFR), consisting of 21 items, was developed through content validity examinations by an expert committee and through face validity examinations for family members. The reliability and validity of the IFR were examined for families with children or with family members requiring care. <b>Results:</b> Temporal stability over a 2-week interval, which was assessed in 26 subjects, was supported by a high and significant correlation coefficient. The following statistical analysis was performed based on the responses of 206 subjects. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient showed high internal consistency reliability. The total IFR score showed a moderately significant correlation with the family function score and the family support demands score, demonstrating acceptable criterion-related validity. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the fit of a five-factor model based on the five systems of CSFET, and construct validity was supported. <b>Conclusions:</b> The reliability and validity of the IFR, which is composed of five factors and 21 items based on the CSFET, were confirmed, making the IFR a viable self-assessment scale for determining the level of family resilience.

Nursing ReportsVol. 15(5)
Kobe University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Resilience and Mental Health
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.