Bridging the ecosystem service supply-demand imbalance: Spatial flow patterns and driving forces in the Yangtze River midstream urban agglomeration, China

• Develops integrated ES assessment framework with spatial flows and drivers. • Reveals ES deficits (2000–2020): 82% imbalances in urban cores. • FPF outperforms WYF and CSF in optimizing supply–demand imbalance. • Identifies ESF drivers: FPF (multidimensional), WYF (socioeconomic), CSF (natural). • Strongest ES interlinkages emerge at county level. Rapid urbanization has intensified ecosystem service (ES) supply–demand imbalances in urban agglomerations, particularly for food production (FP), water yield (WY), and carbon sequestration (CS). This study analyzes spatial flow patterns and driving forces of these critical services in China’s Yangtze River Midstream Urban Agglomeration (YRMA, 2000–2020). Using Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs model (InVEST) for supply–demand quantification and spatial models (Gaussian Two-Step Floating Catchment Area, Breakpoint-Field Strength model) for ecosystem service flows (ESF) simulation. The Geo-Detector model was applied to identify key drivers of flow volume and direction from natural conditions, landscape characteristics, and socio-economic perspectives. We identified three key findings: (1) Temporal analysis of the supply–demand balance index (SDI) revealed divergent trends, with FP showing steady growth, WY demonstrating fluctuating increases, and CS experiencing continuous decline. Spatially, 82 % of supply–demand imbalances concentrated in core urban areas, with spatial extents progressively expanding. (2) FP flow (FPF) initial flows mitigated local deficits (77,100 t max), enhanced by cross-regional transfers (270,500 t max), while WY flow (WYF) covered 48 % of the entire study area and CS flow (CSF) served only 37 % of imbalanced zones, both limited by non-selective flows. (3) Driving forces displayed specific patterns: FPF was influenced by multiple factors, WYF was primarily socio-economically driven, and CSF was mainly determined by natural conditions. These findings offer critical insights for balancing ESs and guiding ecological policies in urban agglomerations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113531
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the ecosystem service supply-demand imbalance: Spatial flow patterns and driving forces in the Yangtze River midstream urban agglomeration, China

Xiaowen Zhou, Hongjie Peng, Wei Ren, Xuesong Zhang et al.
14 citations
Ecological Indicators
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
15.47
article

Bridging the ecosystem service supply-demand imbalance: Spatial flow patterns and driving forces in the Yangtze River midstream urban agglomeration, China

Xiaowen Zhou, Hongjie Peng, Wei Ren, Xuesong Zhang, Qiuyu Zou
article en
14 citations

Abstract

• Develops integrated ES assessment framework with spatial flows and drivers. • Reveals ES deficits (2000–2020): 82% imbalances in urban cores. • FPF outperforms WYF and CSF in optimizing supply–demand imbalance. • Identifies ESF drivers: FPF (multidimensional), WYF (socioeconomic), CSF (natural). • Strongest ES interlinkages emerge at county level. Rapid urbanization has intensified ecosystem service (ES) supply–demand imbalances in urban agglomerations, particularly for food production (FP), water yield (WY), and carbon sequestration (CS). This study analyzes spatial flow patterns and driving forces of these critical services in China’s Yangtze River Midstream Urban Agglomeration (YRMA, 2000–2020). Using Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs model (InVEST) for supply–demand quantification and spatial models (Gaussian Two-Step Floating Catchment Area, Breakpoint-Field Strength model) for ecosystem service flows (ESF) simulation. The Geo-Detector model was applied to identify key drivers of flow volume and direction from natural conditions, landscape characteristics, and socio-economic perspectives. We identified three key findings: (1) Temporal analysis of the supply–demand balance index (SDI) revealed divergent trends, with FP showing steady growth, WY demonstrating fluctuating increases, and CS experiencing continuous decline. Spatially, 82 % of supply–demand imbalances concentrated in core urban areas, with spatial extents progressively expanding. (2) FP flow (FPF) initial flows mitigated local deficits (77,100 t max), enhanced by cross-regional transfers (270,500 t max), while WY flow (WYF) covered 48 % of the entire study area and CS flow (CSF) served only 37 % of imbalanced zones, both limited by non-selective flows. (3) Driving forces displayed specific patterns: FPF was influenced by multiple factors, WYF was primarily socio-economically driven, and CSF was mainly determined by natural conditions. These findings offer critical insights for balancing ESs and guiding ecological policies in urban agglomerations.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 175
Central China Normal University (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
15.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.