How do stakeholders engage with critical cartography in planning? Analysis of a decision-making process in marine governance

Maps play a vital role in planning processes, especially marine spatial planning (MSP), as they are the primary means of representing the vast ocean spaces for stakeholders. While numerous studies have explored the roles stakeholders play and their involvement in MSP, few have considered how maps are created for these stakeholders or how they interpret them. This research seeks to unveil the ‘black box’ of mapping, highlighting how stakeholders engage with the decision-making aspects of map creation and expanding the knowledge base in this domain. It examines the interplay between power and knowledge by analysing how laypeople engage in critical cartography and why it is crucial they understand the maps. Data was collected from focus groups consisting of 30 stakeholders from professional marine sectors, civil society and state departments. The findings reveal that stakeholders actively engage in critical cartography, demonstrating how power dynamics are shaped by the use and perception of maps. These dynamics often reinforce the dominance of already powerful stakeholders. The study confirms the existence of non-academic critical cartography and emphasises the importance of taking it into account in multi-stakeholder workshops and participatory mapping projects to prevent the reinforcement of power imbalances. This approach can foster a more equitable mapping process, ensuring that all voices are heard. • Maps shape power dynamics, often reinforcing dominant stakeholders in marine planning. • Stakeholders actively engage in critical cartography, challenging power imbalances. • Participatory mapping fosters fairness in multi-stakeholder decision-making processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104083
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do stakeholders engage with critical cartography in planning? Analysis of a decision-making process in marine governance

Brice Trouillet, Juliette Davret
2 citations
Environmental Science & Policy
Coastal and Marine Management
4.84
article

How do stakeholders engage with critical cartography in planning? Analysis of a decision-making process in marine governance

Brice Trouillet, Juliette Davret
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Maps play a vital role in planning processes, especially marine spatial planning (MSP), as they are the primary means of representing the vast ocean spaces for stakeholders. While numerous studies have explored the roles stakeholders play and their involvement in MSP, few have considered how maps are created for these stakeholders or how they interpret them. This research seeks to unveil the ‘black box’ of mapping, highlighting how stakeholders engage with the decision-making aspects of map creation and expanding the knowledge base in this domain. It examines the interplay between power and knowledge by analysing how laypeople engage in critical cartography and why it is crucial they understand the maps. Data was collected from focus groups consisting of 30 stakeholders from professional marine sectors, civil society and state departments. The findings reveal that stakeholders actively engage in critical cartography, demonstrating how power dynamics are shaped by the use and perception of maps. These dynamics often reinforce the dominance of already powerful stakeholders. The study confirms the existence of non-academic critical cartography and emphasises the importance of taking it into account in multi-stakeholder workshops and participatory mapping projects to prevent the reinforcement of power imbalances. This approach can foster a more equitable mapping process, ensuring that all voices are heard. • Maps shape power dynamics, often reinforcing dominant stakeholders in marine planning. • Stakeholders actively engage in critical cartography, challenging power imbalances. • Participatory mapping fosters fairness in multi-stakeholder decision-making processes.

Environmental Science & PolicyVol. 169
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Littoral, Environnement, Télédétection, Géomatique (FR), Nantes Université (FR)
Université de Nantes, Conseil Régional des Pays de la Loire
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Coastal and Marine Management
4.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.