SCIENCE EDUCATION FOR STUDENTS WITH DYSLEXIA: ASSESSING READING STRATEGIES USING EYE-TRACKING TECHNOLOGY

Students diagnosed with dyslexia often encounter difficulties when engaging with instructional content designed for neurotypical learners, particularly in the field of science education. Contemporary educational materials enriched with seductive details are intended to capture students’ attention and increase engagement. However, for students with dyslexia, such enhancements can hinder the learning process. While methods for identifying special educational needs are becoming more sophisticated, there remains a lack of research on diagnostics based on modern technologies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the science text reading strategies of a student with dyslexia using the eye-tracking platform “RealEye” and to compare them with those of a neurotypical student. The case analysis revealed clear differences in information processing approaches between the two students. The participant with dyslexia exhibited longer and more frequent eye fixations—visible in heatmaps—more frequent regressions (returns to previously read text), and experienced greater difficulty in efficiently processing information. Additional elements of the learning material (image, infographic, highlighted text) often imposed an extra cognitive load on the student with dyslexia, whereas for the neurotypical student, they facilitated more effective text navigation. The findings confirm the value of eye-tracking technology in assessing and adapting individualized instructional strategies in science education. Keywords: reading disorder, science education, eye-tracking technology, cognitive load

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural Science Education in a Comprehensive School (NSECS)
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48127/gu/25.31.98
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SCIENCE EDUCATION FOR STUDENTS WITH DYSLEXIA: ASSESSING READING STRATEGIES USING EYE-TRACKING TECHNOLOGY

Aušrinė Raudoniūtė
1 citations
Natural Science Education in a Comprehensive School (NSECS)
Reading and Literacy Development
3.44
article

SCIENCE EDUCATION FOR STUDENTS WITH DYSLEXIA: ASSESSING READING STRATEGIES USING EYE-TRACKING TECHNOLOGY

Aušrinė Raudoniūtė
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Students diagnosed with dyslexia often encounter difficulties when engaging with instructional content designed for neurotypical learners, particularly in the field of science education. Contemporary educational materials enriched with seductive details are intended to capture students’ attention and increase engagement. However, for students with dyslexia, such enhancements can hinder the learning process. While methods for identifying special educational needs are becoming more sophisticated, there remains a lack of research on diagnostics based on modern technologies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the science text reading strategies of a student with dyslexia using the eye-tracking platform “RealEye” and to compare them with those of a neurotypical student. The case analysis revealed clear differences in information processing approaches between the two students. The participant with dyslexia exhibited longer and more frequent eye fixations—visible in heatmaps—more frequent regressions (returns to previously read text), and experienced greater difficulty in efficiently processing information. Additional elements of the learning material (image, infographic, highlighted text) often imposed an extra cognitive load on the student with dyslexia, whereas for the neurotypical student, they facilitated more effective text navigation. The findings confirm the value of eye-tracking technology in assessing and adapting individualized instructional strategies in science education. Keywords: reading disorder, science education, eye-tracking technology, cognitive load

Natural Science Education in a Comprehensive School (NSECS)Vol. 31(1)
Kaunas University of Technology (LT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Reading and Literacy Development
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.