Natural deep eutectic solvent-based matrix solid-phase dispersion-ultrasound assisted extraction of pesticides in pears and their determination by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

• Development of a NADES-based MSPD-UAE method for pesticides extraction in pears. • Multivariate optimization of variables by Box-Behnken design. • Limits of detection below the Maximum Residue Limits allowed within the European Union. • Green and practicality metrics demonstrated superiority as compared to previous methods. In recent years, natural deep eutectic solvents (NADES) have been proposed as sustainable solvents capable of replacing the conventional harmful organic solvents typically used in sample preparation. In this regard, in this work, several NADES have been evaluated for the development of a matrix solid phase dispersion - ultrasound-assisted extraction (MSPD-UAE) method for selected pesticides (thiamethoxam, thiacloprid, pirimicarb, acetamiprid and tebuconazole) from pear (peel and pulp) samples and final determination by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Among the different NADES and dispersants tested, the one consisting of choline chloride:1,3-propanediol in a 1:4 molar ratio combined with alumina showed the best performance. The effect of the amount of dispersant, the volume of NADES, the temperature of the ultrasonic bath and the duration of sonication was then optimised using response surface methodology (RSM) based on a four-factor, three-level Box-Behnken design. Under optimal conditions, no matrix effect was observed and quantitative recoveries, ranging from 78.5 to 120 % with relative standard deviations (RSDs) lower than 20 % were obtained, reaching limits of quantification within the range 4–10 ng g -1 , depending upon the analyte. In addition, after evaluation by Analytical Greenness Metric for Sample Preparation (AGREEprep), Sample Preparation Metric of Sustainability (SPMS) and Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) metrics tools, the proposed method was found to be superior to other published methods in terms of safety and environmental impact with good applicability potential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Sample Preparation
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sampre.2025.100185
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Natural deep eutectic solvent-based matrix solid-phase dispersion-ultrasound assisted extraction of pesticides in pears and their determination by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Ana I. García‐Valcárcel, Esther Miguel, Antonio Martín‐Esteban
2 citations
Advances in Sample Preparation
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
2.32
article

Natural deep eutectic solvent-based matrix solid-phase dispersion-ultrasound assisted extraction of pesticides in pears and their determination by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Ana I. García‐Valcárcel, Esther Miguel, Antonio Martín‐Esteban
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Development of a NADES-based MSPD-UAE method for pesticides extraction in pears. • Multivariate optimization of variables by Box-Behnken design. • Limits of detection below the Maximum Residue Limits allowed within the European Union. • Green and practicality metrics demonstrated superiority as compared to previous methods. In recent years, natural deep eutectic solvents (NADES) have been proposed as sustainable solvents capable of replacing the conventional harmful organic solvents typically used in sample preparation. In this regard, in this work, several NADES have been evaluated for the development of a matrix solid phase dispersion - ultrasound-assisted extraction (MSPD-UAE) method for selected pesticides (thiamethoxam, thiacloprid, pirimicarb, acetamiprid and tebuconazole) from pear (peel and pulp) samples and final determination by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Among the different NADES and dispersants tested, the one consisting of choline chloride:1,3-propanediol in a 1:4 molar ratio combined with alumina showed the best performance. The effect of the amount of dispersant, the volume of NADES, the temperature of the ultrasonic bath and the duration of sonication was then optimised using response surface methodology (RSM) based on a four-factor, three-level Box-Behnken design. Under optimal conditions, no matrix effect was observed and quantitative recoveries, ranging from 78.5 to 120 % with relative standard deviations (RSDs) lower than 20 % were obtained, reaching limits of quantification within the range 4–10 ng g -1 , depending upon the analyte. In addition, after evaluation by Analytical Greenness Metric for Sample Preparation (AGREEprep), Sample Preparation Metric of Sustainability (SPMS) and Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) metrics tools, the proposed method was found to be superior to other published methods in terms of safety and environmental impact with good applicability potential.

Advances in Sample PreparationVol. 14
Agencia de Medio Ambiente y Agua de Andalucía (ES)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
2.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.