Innovative startups and their traditional peers: Further evidence using performance and survival analysis

Abstract This study assesses the Italian Startup Act, introduced in 2012, to promote innovative entrepreneurship. Focusing on manufacturing firms registered between 2014 and 2017, we compare innovative startups with non‐innovative peers using matching techniques, survival analysis, probit models, and panel regressions. Findings reveal that innovative startups exhibit stronger financial structures, higher survival rates, and fewer credit constraints, though they take longer to achieve profitability. Firms with greater leverage are more likely to register as innovative, while larger firms are less inclined to do so. Intellectual property (IP) compliance correlates with higher survival and stronger patent activity. These results offer insights into industrial policy effectiveness. While the Startup Act supports financial access and firm resilience, its potential to drive innovation and IP development remains underexploited. Our analysis suggests the need for more targeted, regionally nuanced interventions to enhance the policy's impact and better support the growth of Italy's innovation‐driven startup ecosystem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Financial Economics
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.70004
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Private Equity and Venture Capital
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovative startups and their traditional peers: Further evidence using performance and survival analysis

Luisa Anderloni, Murad Harasheh
2 citations
Review of Financial Economics
Private Equity and Venture Capital
7.82
article

Innovative startups and their traditional peers: Further evidence using performance and survival analysis

Luisa Anderloni, Murad Harasheh
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study assesses the Italian Startup Act, introduced in 2012, to promote innovative entrepreneurship. Focusing on manufacturing firms registered between 2014 and 2017, we compare innovative startups with non‐innovative peers using matching techniques, survival analysis, probit models, and panel regressions. Findings reveal that innovative startups exhibit stronger financial structures, higher survival rates, and fewer credit constraints, though they take longer to achieve profitability. Firms with greater leverage are more likely to register as innovative, while larger firms are less inclined to do so. Intellectual property (IP) compliance correlates with higher survival and stronger patent activity. These results offer insights into industrial policy effectiveness. While the Startup Act supports financial access and firm resilience, its potential to drive innovation and IP development remains underexploited. Our analysis suggests the need for more targeted, regionally nuanced interventions to enhance the policy's impact and better support the growth of Italy's innovation‐driven startup ecosystem.

Review of Financial EconomicsVol. 43(3)
University of Milan (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Private Equity and Venture Capital
7.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Innovative startups and their traditional peers: Further evidence using performance and survival analysis — Luisa Anderloni, Murad Harasheh · Review of Financial Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS