Brazilian jiu-jitsu gi vs nogi – a comparative analysis of the motor fitness leveloOf athletes specializing in different fighting formats

<ns3:p>Background: Competition in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ) includes two formats: NoGi (shorts and grappling shirt) and Gi (kimonos). Identifying key motor fitness components is essential due to the specific physical demands of each format. The aim of this study was to assess the differences in motor fitness among BJJ athletes based on their specialization in different fighting formats (Gi vs. NoGi). Methods: Twenty-four male BJJ athletes were divided into two groups by fighting style: NoGi (n=12; age 23.321.25 years; training experience 5.501.88 years) and Gi (n=12; age 23.001.72 years; training experience 5.832.33 years). Motor potential was assessed using non-specific tests (Eurofit battery, computer-based test) and BJJ-specific tests (hanging on a judogi). Relative strength (SW) and anaerobic power (MPA) indices were also calculated. Results: The analysis showed significant differences in motor fitness between Gi and NoGi athletes (p&lt;0.05). The Gi group outperformed in grip strength and bent-arm hang (dc=0.95–1.04), while the NoGi group showed superior results in reaction time, explosive strength, and hybrid agility (dc=1.50–1.63). Other aspects were similar (p&gt;0.05), except for moderate advantages in anaerobic power (dc=0.40) for NoGi and relative strength indices favoring the Gi group (dc=0.70–0.77). Conclusions: NoGi athletes showed a strength-speed motor profile, while Gi athletes exhibited an endurance-strength profile, emphasizing upper-limb isometric endurance for gripping the judogi. These differences reflect distinct motor demands and adaptive strategies in BJJ sub-disciplines, supporting targeted diagnosis, interpretation, and training optimization based on specific performance profiles and sport-specific requirements.</ns3:p>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Kinesiology and Exercise Sciences
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0055.0944
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Martial Arts: Techniques, Psychology, and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brazilian jiu-jitsu gi vs nogi – a comparative analysis of the motor fitness leveloOf athletes specializing in different fighting formats

Wojciech Wąsacz
1 citations
Journal of Kinesiology and Exercise Sciences
Martial Arts: Techniques, Psychology, and Education
2.37
article

Brazilian jiu-jitsu gi vs nogi – a comparative analysis of the motor fitness leveloOf athletes specializing in different fighting formats

Wojciech Wąsacz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<ns3:p>Background: Competition in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ) includes two formats: NoGi (shorts and grappling shirt) and Gi (kimonos). Identifying key motor fitness components is essential due to the specific physical demands of each format. The aim of this study was to assess the differences in motor fitness among BJJ athletes based on their specialization in different fighting formats (Gi vs. NoGi). Methods: Twenty-four male BJJ athletes were divided into two groups by fighting style: NoGi (n=12; age 23.321.25 years; training experience 5.501.88 years) and Gi (n=12; age 23.001.72 years; training experience 5.832.33 years). Motor potential was assessed using non-specific tests (Eurofit battery, computer-based test) and BJJ-specific tests (hanging on a judogi). Relative strength (SW) and anaerobic power (MPA) indices were also calculated. Results: The analysis showed significant differences in motor fitness between Gi and NoGi athletes (p&lt;0.05). The Gi group outperformed in grip strength and bent-arm hang (dc=0.95–1.04), while the NoGi group showed superior results in reaction time, explosive strength, and hybrid agility (dc=1.50–1.63). Other aspects were similar (p&gt;0.05), except for moderate advantages in anaerobic power (dc=0.40) for NoGi and relative strength indices favoring the Gi group (dc=0.70–0.77). Conclusions: NoGi athletes showed a strength-speed motor profile, while Gi athletes exhibited an endurance-strength profile, emphasizing upper-limb isometric endurance for gripping the judogi. These differences reflect distinct motor demands and adaptive strategies in BJJ sub-disciplines, supporting targeted diagnosis, interpretation, and training optimization based on specific performance profiles and sport-specific requirements.</ns3:p>

Journal of Kinesiology and Exercise Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Martial Arts: Techniques, Psychology, and Education
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.