Comparing elite sport coaches’ pressure training practices to recommended guidelines

This study reports the application of elite sport coaches’ pressure training practices and the extent to which these individuals followed a multi-phased pressure training framework, recently proposed by Fletcher and Arnold (2021). Nine Australian sport coaches participated in the study. Participants included coaches of current or former elite-level athletes, and were either currently using, or had previously used, pressure training activities in their training sessions. Participation involved undertaking semi-structured interviews, with interview questions tailored to the three phases (design, implementation, debrief and review) of Fletcher and Arnold's multi-phased framework (Fletcher and Arnold, 2021). In addition, the coaches were asked to comment on their perceived facilitators and challenges involved in designing and implementing their pressure training tasks. The results showed disparity between the recommended framework and the coaches’ current uses of pressure training. The study revealed that, although coaches understood pressure training and believed it to be beneficial, no participant followed the multi-phased framework in its entirety. All participants expressed facing limitations regarding adequate knowledge, support, and resources when attempting to conduct pressure training interventions in their respective sports. It is recommended that future researchers collaborate closely with elite coaches to explore their training practices and determine how to best support their use of pressure training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541251333935
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sport Psychology and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing elite sport coaches’ pressure training practices to recommended guidelines

Tristan J. Coulter, Adam D. Gorman, Dana J Ortez
1 citations
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Sport Psychology and Performance
3.44
article

Comparing elite sport coaches’ pressure training practices to recommended guidelines

Tristan J. Coulter, Adam D. Gorman, Dana J Ortez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study reports the application of elite sport coaches’ pressure training practices and the extent to which these individuals followed a multi-phased pressure training framework, recently proposed by Fletcher and Arnold (2021). Nine Australian sport coaches participated in the study. Participants included coaches of current or former elite-level athletes, and were either currently using, or had previously used, pressure training activities in their training sessions. Participation involved undertaking semi-structured interviews, with interview questions tailored to the three phases (design, implementation, debrief and review) of Fletcher and Arnold's multi-phased framework (Fletcher and Arnold, 2021). In addition, the coaches were asked to comment on their perceived facilitators and challenges involved in designing and implementing their pressure training tasks. The results showed disparity between the recommended framework and the coaches’ current uses of pressure training. The study revealed that, although coaches understood pressure training and believed it to be beneficial, no participant followed the multi-phased framework in its entirety. All participants expressed facing limitations regarding adequate knowledge, support, and resources when attempting to conduct pressure training interventions in their respective sports. It is recommended that future researchers collaborate closely with elite coaches to explore their training practices and determine how to best support their use of pressure training.

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sport Psychology and Performance
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.