A literal act of congress: reconciling conservation science and policy

Modern conservation is a complex intersection of biological, physical, and social sciences applied to balance ecological needs and human interests within a defined regulatory framework; developing comprehensive policy recommendations that account for this complexity is challenging. New policy recommendations should be presented with adequate consideration for their scientific justifications, social implications and legal applications. Policy proposals that are not adequately contextualized risk undermining public trust and missing opportunities for advocacy; two examples are provided. Greater collaboration across the research and applied conservation disciplines, increased representation of environmental law and conservation policy expertise, and partnerships between schools of law and biological sciences could facilitate the advancement of more comprehensive policy proposals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Conservation Science
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2025.1554025
Primary Topic
Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A literal act of congress: reconciling conservation science and policy

Annie L. Booth, Jennifer R. Ballard
Frontiers in Conservation Science
Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
article

A literal act of congress: reconciling conservation science and policy

Annie L. Booth, Jennifer R. Ballard
article en

Abstract

Modern conservation is a complex intersection of biological, physical, and social sciences applied to balance ecological needs and human interests within a defined regulatory framework; developing comprehensive policy recommendations that account for this complexity is challenging. New policy recommendations should be presented with adequate consideration for their scientific justifications, social implications and legal applications. Policy proposals that are not adequately contextualized risk undermining public trust and missing opportunities for advocacy; two examples are provided. Greater collaboration across the research and applied conservation disciplines, increased representation of environmental law and conservation policy expertise, and partnerships between schools of law and biological sciences could facilitate the advancement of more comprehensive policy proposals.

Frontiers in Conservation ScienceVol. 6
Arkansas Department of Agriculture (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.