Impact analysis of constructed wetland for wastewater management in Rwanda

Constructed wetland (CW) is cost-effective, easy to operate, maintain, and offer significant natural potential for application in urban areas compared to conventional treatment systems. Despite their effectiveness in wastewater management, CWs have yet to see widespread adoption in Rwanda. This study aimed to analyze the impact of constructed wetland for wastewater treatment located in Gasabo district, Kigali City of Rwanda for water pollution dipping by testing eight physico-chemical parameters such as: pH, TN, TP, TSS, TDS, COD, BOD, and DO in the samples collected at the influents and effluents of the CW during rainy and dry seasons in twelve months of year 2023, relating their concentrations with standards of the World Health Organization (WHO), determining the CW removal efficiency and finally, to provide summary of measurement by the CCME-WQI. The results revealed that, the most parameters have been exceeding the standards before being treated, then after all effluents responded to standard conditions. The removal efficiencies in both seasons valued between 16-80% which presented a good concert in treatment. Furthermore, the index showed a high pollution on influent which was counted 42.1 and 46.4 in both dry and rain seasons respectively as poor and marginal quality, on the other side of effluent the results indicated 87.7and 89.1 ranked as good quality. These above values demonstrated the effective performance of constructed wetland regarding the production of the effluent that met the specified water quality standard despite elevated influent concentrations in terms of pollutants. Further application of CW in other organizations/institutions (public and private) is greatly suggested to treat their wastewater before reaching water flows in the environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1559624
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact analysis of constructed wetland for wastewater management in Rwanda

Christophe Mupenzi, Xi Chen, Adeline Umugwaneza, Aboubakar Gasirabo et al.
3 citations
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
2.45
article

Impact analysis of constructed wetland for wastewater management in Rwanda

Christophe Mupenzi, Xi Chen, Adeline Umugwaneza, Aboubakar Gasirabo, Egide Hakorimana, Richard Mind’je, Schadrack Niyonsenga, Justin Nsanzabaganwa, Tie Liu, Flora Malayika, Marie Louise Mujawayezu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Constructed wetland (CW) is cost-effective, easy to operate, maintain, and offer significant natural potential for application in urban areas compared to conventional treatment systems. Despite their effectiveness in wastewater management, CWs have yet to see widespread adoption in Rwanda. This study aimed to analyze the impact of constructed wetland for wastewater treatment located in Gasabo district, Kigali City of Rwanda for water pollution dipping by testing eight physico-chemical parameters such as: pH, TN, TP, TSS, TDS, COD, BOD, and DO in the samples collected at the influents and effluents of the CW during rainy and dry seasons in twelve months of year 2023, relating their concentrations with standards of the World Health Organization (WHO), determining the CW removal efficiency and finally, to provide summary of measurement by the CCME-WQI. The results revealed that, the most parameters have been exceeding the standards before being treated, then after all effluents responded to standard conditions. The removal efficiencies in both seasons valued between 16-80% which presented a good concert in treatment. Furthermore, the index showed a high pollution on influent which was counted 42.1 and 46.4 in both dry and rain seasons respectively as poor and marginal quality, on the other side of effluent the results indicated 87.7and 89.1 ranked as good quality. These above values demonstrated the effective performance of constructed wetland regarding the production of the effluent that met the specified water quality standard despite elevated influent concentrations in terms of pollutants. Further application of CW in other organizations/institutions (public and private) is greatly suggested to treat their wastewater before reaching water flows in the environment.

Frontiers in Environmental ScienceVol. 13
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), University of Lay Adventists of Kigali (RW), Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Zhejiang University of Technology (CN), Xinjiang University (CN)
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, China Scholarship Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
2.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.