Longitudinal Relationships Between Empathy and Bullying Among Boys and Girls: A Random Intercept Cross‐Lagged Panel Model Study

For decades, empathy has been hypothesized as a protective factor against bullying. However, this hypothesis is mainly supported by cross-sectional studies, while longitudinal research on bullying and empathy is still scarce. The present study aimed to fill this gap by conducting random-intercept cross-lagged panel models of the relations between cognitive and affective empathy and bullying behaviors across three-time points each separated by 5 months, separately for boys and girls. Results from 1228 elementary school students (52.92% boys; Mage = 10.19, SD = 1.13) indicated that the associations between bullying and empathy are different for boys and girls. For boys, cognitive and affective empathy are negatively associated with bullying at the between level. At the within level, the only significant cross-lagged path indicated that a positive deviation from the expected score of cognitive empathy at baseline predicted a positive deviation from the expected score in bullying behavior 5 months later. For girls, there were no associations between empathy and bullying at either the within- or between-level. This study calls for further clarification of the direction of the relation between bullying and empathy before incorporating it into prevention programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aggressive Behavior
Published
2025-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.70026
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Longitudinal Relationships Between Empathy and Bullying Among Boys and Girls: A Random Intercept Cross‐Lagged Panel Model Study

Christina Salmivalli, Chloé Tolmatcheff, Benoît Galand, Charlie Devleeschouwer
3 citations
Aggressive Behavior
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
7.32
article

Longitudinal Relationships Between Empathy and Bullying Among Boys and Girls: A Random Intercept Cross‐Lagged Panel Model Study

Christina Salmivalli, Chloé Tolmatcheff, Benoît Galand, Charlie Devleeschouwer
article en
3 citations

Abstract

For decades, empathy has been hypothesized as a protective factor against bullying. However, this hypothesis is mainly supported by cross-sectional studies, while longitudinal research on bullying and empathy is still scarce. The present study aimed to fill this gap by conducting random-intercept cross-lagged panel models of the relations between cognitive and affective empathy and bullying behaviors across three-time points each separated by 5 months, separately for boys and girls. Results from 1228 elementary school students (52.92% boys; Mage = 10.19, SD = 1.13) indicated that the associations between bullying and empathy are different for boys and girls. For boys, cognitive and affective empathy are negatively associated with bullying at the between level. At the within level, the only significant cross-lagged path indicated that a positive deviation from the expected score of cognitive empathy at baseline predicted a positive deviation from the expected score in bullying behavior 5 months later. For girls, there were no associations between empathy and bullying at either the within- or between-level. This study calls for further clarification of the direction of the relation between bullying and empathy before incorporating it into prevention programs.

Aggressive BehaviorVol. 51(3)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Turku (FI)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
7.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.