Analyzing Civil-Military Response in Pakistan’s Counter-Terrorism Efforts (2014–2016)

The study attempts to evaluate the civil-military response in Pakistan's counter-terrorism efforts between 2014 and 2016 as this period was characterized by significant security challenges and decisive state actions. It commences by examining the government's strategic shift in 2014 in response to the escalation of terrorist activities, particularly the Army Public School (APS) Peshawar attack, which marked a critical turning point in civil-military cooperation. The research investigates into the complex relationship between state politics and the rising threat of terrorism, with a particular emphasis on the All-Parties Conference and the development of the 20-point National Action Plan (NAP) that facilitated the cultivation of political consensus. It also examines Pakistan's diplomatic interactions, particularly with Afghanistan, which are designed to promote regional harmony. Operation Zarb-e-Azb (2014–2016) is a critical component of this period, emphasizing the military's operational leadership and collaboration with civilian authorities. By evaluating strategic diplomacy, operational measures, and policy decisions, the article assesses the efficacy and constraints of the civil-military nexus. The results indicate that while cooperation enhanced national security outcomes, long-term counterterrorism success necessitates democratic oversight, inclusive political will, and sustained institutional alignment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
journal of social sciences review
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62843/jssr.v5i1.503
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing Civil-Military Response in Pakistan’s Counter-Terrorism Efforts (2014–2016)

Muhammad Tazeem Javed, Malik Hammad Ahmad, Muhammad Shafiq
2 citations
journal of social sciences review
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
17.04
article

Analyzing Civil-Military Response in Pakistan’s Counter-Terrorism Efforts (2014–2016)

Muhammad Tazeem Javed, Malik Hammad Ahmad, Muhammad Shafiq
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The study attempts to evaluate the civil-military response in Pakistan's counter-terrorism efforts between 2014 and 2016 as this period was characterized by significant security challenges and decisive state actions. It commences by examining the government's strategic shift in 2014 in response to the escalation of terrorist activities, particularly the Army Public School (APS) Peshawar attack, which marked a critical turning point in civil-military cooperation. The research investigates into the complex relationship between state politics and the rising threat of terrorism, with a particular emphasis on the All-Parties Conference and the development of the 20-point National Action Plan (NAP) that facilitated the cultivation of political consensus. It also examines Pakistan's diplomatic interactions, particularly with Afghanistan, which are designed to promote regional harmony. Operation Zarb-e-Azb (2014–2016) is a critical component of this period, emphasizing the military's operational leadership and collaboration with civilian authorities. By evaluating strategic diplomacy, operational measures, and policy decisions, the article assesses the efficacy and constraints of the civil-military nexus. The results indicate that while cooperation enhanced national security outcomes, long-term counterterrorism success necessitates democratic oversight, inclusive political will, and sustained institutional alignment.

journal of social sciences reviewVol. 5(1)
Islamia University of Bahawalpur (PK), Allama Iqbal Open University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.