How Dare Construction in English

This paper discusses the how dare construction in English, analyzing the mismatch between its syntactic form and meaning (including its pragmatic function). The key goal of this study is to investigate the syntactic and semantic characteristics of this construction within the framework of Construction Grammar (CxG). This construction exhibits the syntactic structure of an interrogative with subject-auxiliary inversion, where the auxiliary comprises a unit of dare followed by the infinitival marker to. The sequence ‘how dare + pronoun’ functions semantically as a unit, expressing an intense degree of outrage. By focusing on these syntactic and semantic properties, this study proposes a prototypical constructional meaning, derived from a specific syntactic pattern within CxG. This constructional meaning is supported by statistical validation in terms of collostructional analysis. This meaning is further categorized into four extended meanings: moral outrage, strong disapproval, indignation and self-criticism. The findings indicate that the how dare construction should be a new type of construction inherited from interrogative, exclamative and rhetorical constructions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Language and Information
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29403/li.28.3.8
Primary Topic
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Dare Construction in English

Mija Kim
2 links
Language and Information
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
article

How Dare Construction in English

Mija Kim
article en

Abstract

This paper discusses the how dare construction in English, analyzing the mismatch between its syntactic form and meaning (including its pragmatic function). The key goal of this study is to investigate the syntactic and semantic characteristics of this construction within the framework of Construction Grammar (CxG). This construction exhibits the syntactic structure of an interrogative with subject-auxiliary inversion, where the auxiliary comprises a unit of dare followed by the infinitival marker to. The sequence ‘how dare + pronoun’ functions semantically as a unit, expressing an intense degree of outrage. By focusing on these syntactic and semantic properties, this study proposes a prototypical constructional meaning, derived from a specific syntactic pattern within CxG. This constructional meaning is supported by statistical validation in terms of collostructional analysis. This meaning is further categorized into four extended meanings: moral outrage, strong disapproval, indignation and self-criticism. The findings indicate that the how dare construction should be a new type of construction inherited from interrogative, exclamative and rhetorical constructions.

Language and InformationVol. 28(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Dare Construction in English — Mija Kim · Language and Information (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS