Top‐Down Proteomics: Why and When?

Manifold biological processes at all levels of transcription and translation can lead to the formation of a high number of different protein species (i.e., proteoforms), which outnumber the sequences encoded in the genome by far. Due to the large number of protein molecules formed in this way, which span an enormous range of different physicochemical properties, proteoforms are the functional drivers of all biological processes, creating the need for powerful analytical approaches to decipher this language of life. While bottom-up proteomics has become the most widely used approach, providing features such as high sensitivity, depth of analysis, and throughput, it has its limitations when it comes to identifying, quantifying, and characterizing proteoforms. In particular, the major bottleneck is to assign peptide-level information to the original proteoforms. In contrast, top-down proteomics (TDP) targets the direct analysis of intact proteoforms. Despite being characterized by a number of technological challenges, the TDP community has established numerous protocols that allow easy implementation in any proteomics laboratory. In this viewpoint, we compare both approaches, argue that it is worth embedding TDP experiments, and show fields of research in which TDP can be successfully implemented to perform integrative multi-level proteoformics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PROTEOMICS
Published
2025-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.202400338
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Top‐Down Proteomics: Why and When?

Andreas Tholey, Philipp T. Kaulich
7 citations
PROTEOMICS
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
5.29
article

Top‐Down Proteomics: Why and When?

Andreas Tholey, Philipp T. Kaulich
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Manifold biological processes at all levels of transcription and translation can lead to the formation of a high number of different protein species (i.e., proteoforms), which outnumber the sequences encoded in the genome by far. Due to the large number of protein molecules formed in this way, which span an enormous range of different physicochemical properties, proteoforms are the functional drivers of all biological processes, creating the need for powerful analytical approaches to decipher this language of life. While bottom-up proteomics has become the most widely used approach, providing features such as high sensitivity, depth of analysis, and throughput, it has its limitations when it comes to identifying, quantifying, and characterizing proteoforms. In particular, the major bottleneck is to assign peptide-level information to the original proteoforms. In contrast, top-down proteomics (TDP) targets the direct analysis of intact proteoforms. Despite being characterized by a number of technological challenges, the TDP community has established numerous protocols that allow easy implementation in any proteomics laboratory. In this viewpoint, we compare both approaches, argue that it is worth embedding TDP experiments, and show fields of research in which TDP can be successfully implemented to perform integrative multi-level proteoformics.

PROTEOMICSVol. 25(24)
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
5.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.