Emotion‐Guided Attention Impacts Deliberate Multi‐Evidence Emotion‐Related Perceptual Decision‐Making

Emotion-guided endogenous attention (e.g., attending to fear) may play a crucial role in determining how humans integrate emotional evidence from various sources when assessing the general emotional tenor of the environment. For instance, what emotion a presenter focuses on can shape their perception of the overall emotion of the room. While there is an increasing interest in understanding how endogenous attention affects emotion perception, existing studies have largely focused on single-stimulus perception. There is limited understanding of how endogenous attention influences emotion evidence integration across multiple sources. To investigate this question, human participants (N = 40) were invited to judge the average emotion across an array of faces ranging from fearful to happy. Endogenous attention was manipulated by instructing participants to decide whether the face array was "fearful or not" (fear attention), "happy or not" (happy attention). Eye movement results revealed an endogenous attention-induced sampling bias such that participants paid more attention to extreme emotional evidence congruent with the target emotion. Computational modeling revealed that endogenous attention shifted the decision criterion to be more conservative, leading to reduced target-category decisions. These findings unraveled the cognitive and computational mechanisms of how endogenous attention impacts the way we gather emotional evidence and make integrative decisions, shedding light on emotion-related decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychophysiology
Published
2025-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70059
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emotion‐Guided Attention Impacts Deliberate Multi‐Evidence Emotion‐Related Perceptual Decision‐Making

Jingwen Jin, Hilary Hei Ting Ngai
1 citations
Psychophysiology
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
1.43
article

Emotion‐Guided Attention Impacts Deliberate Multi‐Evidence Emotion‐Related Perceptual Decision‐Making

Jingwen Jin, Hilary Hei Ting Ngai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Emotion-guided endogenous attention (e.g., attending to fear) may play a crucial role in determining how humans integrate emotional evidence from various sources when assessing the general emotional tenor of the environment. For instance, what emotion a presenter focuses on can shape their perception of the overall emotion of the room. While there is an increasing interest in understanding how endogenous attention affects emotion perception, existing studies have largely focused on single-stimulus perception. There is limited understanding of how endogenous attention influences emotion evidence integration across multiple sources. To investigate this question, human participants (N = 40) were invited to judge the average emotion across an array of faces ranging from fearful to happy. Endogenous attention was manipulated by instructing participants to decide whether the face array was "fearful or not" (fear attention), "happy or not" (happy attention). Eye movement results revealed an endogenous attention-induced sampling bias such that participants paid more attention to extreme emotional evidence congruent with the target emotion. Computational modeling revealed that endogenous attention shifted the decision criterion to be more conservative, leading to reduced target-category decisions. These findings unraveled the cognitive and computational mechanisms of how endogenous attention impacts the way we gather emotional evidence and make integrative decisions, shedding light on emotion-related decision-making.

PsychophysiologyVol. 62(5)
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), University of Hong Kong (HK)
University of Hong Kong
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.