Timing Review Iddah Men Based on Reasoning on a Contrario in Positive Law in Indonesia

This study explores the legal provisions concerning the waiting period (iddah) for men using A Contrario reasoning within Indonesia’s positive law framework. Adopting a normative legal research approach, the study finds that Indonesian positive law, particularly Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage jo Law Number 16 of 2019 and Government Regulation Number 9 of 1975, explicitly regulates iddah only for women following divorce or the death of a spouse. In contrast, no legal requirement mandates men to undergo a waiting period before remarrying. Applying the Argumentum A Contrario method, which derives legal interpretation by considering the inverse of existing provisions, the study concludes that since the law exclusively prescribes iddah for women, men are not legally required to observe a waiting period.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JIHAD Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58258/jihad.v7i1.8534
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Timing Review Iddah Men Based on Reasoning on a Contrario in Positive Law in Indonesia

Muhammad Rifaldi Setiawan, Ayang Afira Anugerahayu
JIHAD Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Timing Review Iddah Men Based on Reasoning on a Contrario in Positive Law in Indonesia

Muhammad Rifaldi Setiawan, Ayang Afira Anugerahayu
article en

Abstract

This study explores the legal provisions concerning the waiting period (iddah) for men using A Contrario reasoning within Indonesia’s positive law framework. Adopting a normative legal research approach, the study finds that Indonesian positive law, particularly Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage jo Law Number 16 of 2019 and Government Regulation Number 9 of 1975, explicitly regulates iddah only for women following divorce or the death of a spouse. In contrast, no legal requirement mandates men to undergo a waiting period before remarrying. Applying the Argumentum A Contrario method, which derives legal interpretation by considering the inverse of existing provisions, the study concludes that since the law exclusively prescribes iddah for women, men are not legally required to observe a waiting period.

JIHAD Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan AdministrasiVol. 7(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.