Commognitive and Learning Styles Study of Students' Middle School Understanding of Circles

Understanding of mathematical concepts, especially in circle material, is influenced by students' learning styles and the way they communicate in solving problems. This study aims to analyze how students with visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles apply the commognitive component in solving circle problems. The research method used is a qualitative approach with data collection techniques in the form of observation and interviews. The subject of this research is at public middle school 51 Makassar. The main instruments in this study include learning style questionnaires, written tests, and interviews. The data analysis technique includes three main stages: data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. To ensure data validity, this study used triangulation techniques and sources. The results indicated that students with a visual learning style used more visual mediators and words to understand the concept of a circle. Students with auditory learning styles tend to rely on narration in explaining concepts and are more fluent in oral communication, while students with kinesthetic learning styles use more routines and hands-on practice in solving problems. The conclusion of this study confirms that each learning style has a different tendency to utilize the commognitive component. Therefore, the optimal learning strategy should accommodate various learning styles so that students' understanding of mathematics concepts is more effective and meaningful.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ETDC Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v4i2.2929
Primary Topic
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Commognitive and Learning Styles Study of Students' Middle School Understanding of Circles

Andi Alim Syahri
ETDC Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
article

Commognitive and Learning Styles Study of Students' Middle School Understanding of Circles

Andi Alim Syahri
article en

Abstract

Understanding of mathematical concepts, especially in circle material, is influenced by students' learning styles and the way they communicate in solving problems. This study aims to analyze how students with visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles apply the commognitive component in solving circle problems. The research method used is a qualitative approach with data collection techniques in the form of observation and interviews. The subject of this research is at public middle school 51 Makassar. The main instruments in this study include learning style questionnaires, written tests, and interviews. The data analysis technique includes three main stages: data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. To ensure data validity, this study used triangulation techniques and sources. The results indicated that students with a visual learning style used more visual mediators and words to understand the concept of a circle. Students with auditory learning styles tend to rely on narration in explaining concepts and are more fluent in oral communication, while students with kinesthetic learning styles use more routines and hands-on practice in solving problems. The conclusion of this study confirms that each learning style has a different tendency to utilize the commognitive component. Therefore, the optimal learning strategy should accommodate various learning styles so that students' understanding of mathematics concepts is more effective and meaningful.

ETDC Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational ReviewVol. 4(2)
Muhammadiyah University of Makassar (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.