IFCC recommendations for internal quality control practice: a missed opportunity

The IFCC Task Force on Global Lab Quality (TF-GLQ) has recently released a new guidance for internal quality control (IQC) practice through an approach translating the general principles as stated in the ISO 15189:2022 standard to a series of practical recommendations. The paper contains however important inaccuracies and shortcomings that, in our opinion, make it a missed opportunity for providing a updated guidance for laboratory professionals. In particular, four important issues are discussed: a) how to design IQC strategies in the traceability era, b) how to define IQC acceptance limits, c) how to estimate measurement uncertainty using IQC data, and d) how to manage comparability between the results provided by different analyzers in the same laboratory. Our analysis underscores the necessity for a more systematic, updated, and evidence-based approach to produce an IQC recommendation in line with the IFCC tradition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published
2025-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0486
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IFCC recommendations for internal quality control practice: a missed opportunity

Mario Plebani, Marc Thelen, Hikmet Can Çubukçu, Mauro Panteghini
3 citations
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
3.49
article

IFCC recommendations for internal quality control practice: a missed opportunity

Mario Plebani, Marc Thelen, Hikmet Can Çubukçu, Mauro Panteghini
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The IFCC Task Force on Global Lab Quality (TF-GLQ) has recently released a new guidance for internal quality control (IQC) practice through an approach translating the general principles as stated in the ISO 15189:2022 standard to a series of practical recommendations. The paper contains however important inaccuracies and shortcomings that, in our opinion, make it a missed opportunity for providing a updated guidance for laboratory professionals. In particular, four important issues are discussed: a) how to design IQC strategies in the traceability era, b) how to define IQC acceptance limits, c) how to estimate measurement uncertainty using IQC data, and d) how to manage comparability between the results provided by different analyzers in the same laboratory. Our analysis underscores the necessity for a more systematic, updated, and evidence-based approach to produce an IQC recommendation in line with the IFCC tradition.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)Vol. 63(9)
University of Padua (IT), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL), Directorate of Health (IS), Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix (NL), Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz (PL)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

IFCC recommendations for internal quality control practice: a missed opportunity — Mario Plebani, Marc Thelen, et al. · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS