Students’ Preferences of Oral Corrective Feedback: Traditional vs. Online Learning

Previous studies explored teachers’ perceptions regarding different types of oral corrective feedback (OCF) (see e.g. Alshammari & Wicaksono, 2022). They found some similarities and dissimilarities between instructors’ views and their actual choices and practices regarding OCF, with one of the key findings being that recast was the most commonly used, mainly because teachers considered it very effective for their learners’ education (Alshammari & Wicaksono, 2022). This was not in line with most previous research, which found that recast was the predominant oral correction form employed, even though it was considered the least effective. It was mainly used to keep the smoothness of interaction or to prevent the arousal of negative feelings. However, there is a lack of studies investigating learners’ preferences regarding OCF. Therefore, the current research examines learners’ attitudes towards various oral correction strategies, considering the possible influence of multiple variables such as the context, and specifically comparing online vs. traditional learning English language classes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of English Language
Published
2025-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n6p77
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Students’ Preferences of Oral Corrective Feedback: Traditional vs. Online Learning

Eman Alshammari, Thamir Issa Alomaim
World Journal of English Language
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Students’ Preferences of Oral Corrective Feedback: Traditional vs. Online Learning

Eman Alshammari, Thamir Issa Alomaim
article en

Abstract

Previous studies explored teachers’ perceptions regarding different types of oral corrective feedback (OCF) (see e.g. Alshammari & Wicaksono, 2022). They found some similarities and dissimilarities between instructors’ views and their actual choices and practices regarding OCF, with one of the key findings being that recast was the most commonly used, mainly because teachers considered it very effective for their learners’ education (Alshammari & Wicaksono, 2022). This was not in line with most previous research, which found that recast was the predominant oral correction form employed, even though it was considered the least effective. It was mainly used to keep the smoothness of interaction or to prevent the arousal of negative feelings. However, there is a lack of studies investigating learners’ preferences regarding OCF. Therefore, the current research examines learners’ attitudes towards various oral correction strategies, considering the possible influence of multiple variables such as the context, and specifically comparing online vs. traditional learning English language classes.

World Journal of English LanguageVol. 15(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Students’ Preferences of Oral Corrective Feedback: Traditional vs. Online Learning — Eman Alshammari, Thamir Issa Alomaim · World Journal of English Language (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS