Tinjauan Rechterlijk Pardon: Upaya Variasi Yurisprudensi dan Potensi Subjektivitas Hakim

Judge's pardon (rechterlijk pardon) is a type of decision that has recently been regulated in the National Criminal Code. The birth of judge forgiveness is expected to be a new moral justice for the community. The reason is that criminal decisions in Indonesia are limited to 3 types, namely conviction, release and acquittal. This research uses a normative juridical method with a conceptual approach, legislative approach and comparative law, where this article will discuss the concept of rechterlijk pardon in Indonesia and the Netherlands and Greece. As for this research, it is found that there are similarities between Indonesian rechterlijk pardon and Greece and Indonesia and the Netherlands, where the requirements that affect the decision of rechterlijk pardon to a defendant between the Indonesian Criminal Code and the Dutch WvS are fairly similar, while the similarity with the Greek Criminal Code is the meaning of the authority of the judge to impose a pardon decision on the defendant. This can also make the same case have different decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
As-Syar i Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Published
2025-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47467/as.v7i1.7421
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tinjauan Rechterlijk Pardon: Upaya Variasi Yurisprudensi dan Potensi Subjektivitas Hakim

Muhammad Rafi Rakananda
As-Syar i Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Tinjauan Rechterlijk Pardon: Upaya Variasi Yurisprudensi dan Potensi Subjektivitas Hakim

Muhammad Rafi Rakananda
article en

Abstract

Judge's pardon (rechterlijk pardon) is a type of decision that has recently been regulated in the National Criminal Code. The birth of judge forgiveness is expected to be a new moral justice for the community. The reason is that criminal decisions in Indonesia are limited to 3 types, namely conviction, release and acquittal. This research uses a normative juridical method with a conceptual approach, legislative approach and comparative law, where this article will discuss the concept of rechterlijk pardon in Indonesia and the Netherlands and Greece. As for this research, it is found that there are similarities between Indonesian rechterlijk pardon and Greece and Indonesia and the Netherlands, where the requirements that affect the decision of rechterlijk pardon to a defendant between the Indonesian Criminal Code and the Dutch WvS are fairly similar, while the similarity with the Greek Criminal Code is the meaning of the authority of the judge to impose a pardon decision on the defendant. This can also make the same case have different decisions.

As-Syar i Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling KeluargaVol. 7(1)
Jenderal Soedirman University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tinjauan Rechterlijk Pardon: Upaya Variasi Yurisprudensi dan Potensi Subjektivitas Hakim — Muhammad Rafi Rakananda · As-Syar i Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS