Domesticating technology: Sociotechnical imaginaries of carbon capture and storage in Denmark

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has in recent years gained new attention in national and corporate strategies for achieving climate goals. This is for instance seen in Denmark, where CCS was positioned as the largest single mitigation tool in the 2020 Climate Programme. As an example of how international imaginaries of mitigation technologies translate into national settings, this paper explores how CCS was brought into, adapted and adopted in Danish climate policy. Drawing on document analysis, webinar observation and semi-structured interviews, we identity four arguments ( necessity , ability , capacity and opportunity ) that various actors mobilise to develop a shared sociotechnical imaginary of a CCS-dependent climate future . These arguments are supported by maps and numbers that act as objective truths, serve performative roles and legitimise the future imaginary. We argue that maps and numbers function as tools for domesticating CCS in three ways: nationalising , utilising and controlling technology as well as the opposition to it. We conclude that maps and numbers, through domestication, naturalise and depoliticise the STI of a CCS-dependent future. While this may not be intentional by the actors involved, it illustrates the ability of artefacts and arguments to devise specific techno-political pathways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104087
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Domesticating technology: Sociotechnical imaginaries of carbon capture and storage in Denmark

Inge‐Merete Hougaard, Kirstine Lund Christiansen
5 citations
Energy Research & Social Science
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
5.53
article

Domesticating technology: Sociotechnical imaginaries of carbon capture and storage in Denmark

Inge‐Merete Hougaard, Kirstine Lund Christiansen
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has in recent years gained new attention in national and corporate strategies for achieving climate goals. This is for instance seen in Denmark, where CCS was positioned as the largest single mitigation tool in the 2020 Climate Programme. As an example of how international imaginaries of mitigation technologies translate into national settings, this paper explores how CCS was brought into, adapted and adopted in Danish climate policy. Drawing on document analysis, webinar observation and semi-structured interviews, we identity four arguments ( necessity , ability , capacity and opportunity ) that various actors mobilise to develop a shared sociotechnical imaginary of a CCS-dependent climate future . These arguments are supported by maps and numbers that act as objective truths, serve performative roles and legitimise the future imaginary. We argue that maps and numbers function as tools for domesticating CCS in three ways: nationalising , utilising and controlling technology as well as the opposition to it. We conclude that maps and numbers, through domestication, naturalise and depoliticise the STI of a CCS-dependent future. While this may not be intentional by the actors involved, it illustrates the ability of artefacts and arguments to devise specific techno-political pathways.

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 125
University of Copenhagen (DK), Copenhagen Business School (DK), Lund University (SE), Department of Social Sciences (RU)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Lunds Universitet, Vetenskapsrådet
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
5.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.