Syntactic analyses on the be-insertion structure and suggestions for the L1 transfer research

The nontargetlike insertion of be-verbs before thematic verbs is often analyzed as a transfer of topic-prominence from learners’ L1, due to the perceived similarity between inserted be-verbs and the topic marker -un/nun in Korean. However, attributing L1 transfer based solely on superficial dissimilarities with the target grammar and similarities with the L1 can be problematic. To address these limitations, this study proposes multiple syntactic structures for clauses containing unnecessary be-verbs. This analysis demonstrates that a single surface structure can arise from multiple underlying syntactic forms. Additionally, following Jarvis (2000, 2006), this study emphasizes the need for L1 transfer research to incorporate cross-L1 comparisons and track developmental changes across proficiency levels within the same L1 group.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Secondary English Education
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20487/kasee.18.2.202504.1
Primary Topic
Speech and dialogue systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Syntactic analyses on the be-insertion structure and suggestions for the L1 transfer research

Bora Nam
Secondary English Education
Speech and dialogue systems
article

Syntactic analyses on the be-insertion structure and suggestions for the L1 transfer research

Bora Nam
article en

Abstract

The nontargetlike insertion of be-verbs before thematic verbs is often analyzed as a transfer of topic-prominence from learners’ L1, due to the perceived similarity between inserted be-verbs and the topic marker -un/nun in Korean. However, attributing L1 transfer based solely on superficial dissimilarities with the target grammar and similarities with the L1 can be problematic. To address these limitations, this study proposes multiple syntactic structures for clauses containing unnecessary be-verbs. This analysis demonstrates that a single surface structure can arise from multiple underlying syntactic forms. Additionally, following Jarvis (2000, 2006), this study emphasizes the need for L1 transfer research to incorporate cross-L1 comparisons and track developmental changes across proficiency levels within the same L1 group.

Secondary English EducationVol. 18(02)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Speech and dialogue systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.