<scp>CLASS</scp>, <scp>CLIMATE AND CITIES</scp>: Why is ‘Sustainability’ Most Popular at an Urban Scale?

Abstract Class is crucial for understanding why sustainability has become so much more popular at the urban than at other scales. The urban scale is where the capitalist class can most easily colour their investments ‘green’ without confronting the overall power of fossil capital. Urban sustainability has therefore become the limited answer to a question that should really be posed at other geographical scales. In this article I analyse the intersections between class and geographical scale to examine and criticize the class character of the sustainable city. I use a stratification approach to identify the irony of people with high carbon footprints tending to live in the ‘greenest’ cities or city districts. This is class in the sustainable city. A Marxist understanding—not least one emphasizing the capitalist class as a class —can help us grasp the class character of urban sustainability. This latter approach helps us identify how class produces urban sustainability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
Published
2025-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13326
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CLASS, CLIMATE AND CITIES: Why is ‘Sustainability’ Most Popular at an Urban Scale?

Ståle Holgersen
4 citations
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
Urban Transport and Accessibility
8.71
article

CLASS, CLIMATE AND CITIES: Why is ‘Sustainability’ Most Popular at an Urban Scale?

Ståle Holgersen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Class is crucial for understanding why sustainability has become so much more popular at the urban than at other scales. The urban scale is where the capitalist class can most easily colour their investments ‘green’ without confronting the overall power of fossil capital. Urban sustainability has therefore become the limited answer to a question that should really be posed at other geographical scales. In this article I analyse the intersections between class and geographical scale to examine and criticize the class character of the sustainable city. I use a stratification approach to identify the irony of people with high carbon footprints tending to live in the ‘greenest’ cities or city districts. This is class in the sustainable city. A Marxist understanding—not least one emphasizing the capitalist class as a class —can help us grasp the class character of urban sustainability. This latter approach helps us identify how class produces urban sustainability.

International Journal of Urban and Regional ResearchVol. 49(4)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
8.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.