Feeding Tolerance to a Running Gut-Challenge Protocol: a Cross-Sectional Exploration

This study examined gastrointestinal function, substrate utilization, and exercise performance differences in response to a gut-challenge between (1) female and male athletes, (2) young adult versus masters athletes, and (3) athletes with or without exercise-associated gastrointestinal symptom history (Ex-GIS). Fifty-three endurance athletes (43 males and 10 females) completed a gut-challenge involving a 2-hour run (60% <i>V̇</i>O<sub>2max</sub>) with 90 g/h carbohydrate intake, followed by a 1-hour self-paced distance test (DT) with <i>ad libitum</i> water. Blood and breath samples were collected pre- and post-exercise. Blood glucose and substrate utilization during exercise were measured, while Ex-GIS and feeding tolerance were assessed pre-, during, and post-exercise. Interest in food and appetite during exercise was lower in symptomatic athletes than asymptomatic athletes (<i>p</i><0.05). Females had a higher blood glucose concentration during exercise (<i>p</i>=0.037) and immediately after exercise (<i>p</i>=0.003) and a lower whole-body fat oxidation rate during exercise (<i>p</i>=0.009). Exercise performance did not differ based on the biological sex, age, and Ex-GIS history. Overall, gastrointestinal functional markers were comparable between groups, while feeding tolerance and substrate availability and utilization appear to be influenced by the Ex-GIS history and biological sex, respectively. Tailored management of gastrointestinal issues in athletes should be based on an individual basis as opposed to general demographic characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2025-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2541-2821
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feeding Tolerance to a Running Gut-Challenge Protocol: a Cross-Sectional Exploration

Jessica R. Biesiekierski, Ricardo J. S. Costa, Isabel G. Martinez, Christopher Rauch
1 citations
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
1.15
article

Feeding Tolerance to a Running Gut-Challenge Protocol: a Cross-Sectional Exploration

Jessica R. Biesiekierski, Ricardo J. S. Costa, Isabel G. Martinez, Christopher Rauch
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study examined gastrointestinal function, substrate utilization, and exercise performance differences in response to a gut-challenge between (1) female and male athletes, (2) young adult versus masters athletes, and (3) athletes with or without exercise-associated gastrointestinal symptom history (Ex-GIS). Fifty-three endurance athletes (43 males and 10 females) completed a gut-challenge involving a 2-hour run (60% <i>V̇</i>O<sub>2max</sub>) with 90 g/h carbohydrate intake, followed by a 1-hour self-paced distance test (DT) with <i>ad libitum</i> water. Blood and breath samples were collected pre- and post-exercise. Blood glucose and substrate utilization during exercise were measured, while Ex-GIS and feeding tolerance were assessed pre-, during, and post-exercise. Interest in food and appetite during exercise was lower in symptomatic athletes than asymptomatic athletes (<i>p</i><0.05). Females had a higher blood glucose concentration during exercise (<i>p</i>=0.037) and immediately after exercise (<i>p</i>=0.003) and a lower whole-body fat oxidation rate during exercise (<i>p</i>=0.009). Exercise performance did not differ based on the biological sex, age, and Ex-GIS history. Overall, gastrointestinal functional markers were comparable between groups, while feeding tolerance and substrate availability and utilization appear to be influenced by the Ex-GIS history and biological sex, respectively. Tailored management of gastrointestinal issues in athletes should be based on an individual basis as opposed to general demographic characteristics.

International Journal of Sports MedicineVol. 46(07)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Ecosystem Sciences (AU), Monash University (AU)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.