Sustainable but Not Accountable? A Quality Assessment of Sustainability Disclosure in Benefit Corporations

ABSTRACT Benefit corporations are businesses characterised by a dual purpose: profit and the common good. While these businesses are expected to pursue a high level of transparency, some studies have noted ambiguous and inconsistent behaviour in the quality of their reports and communication with stakeholders. The literature proposed reporting quality indexes and identified explanatory factors, although specific research on disclosure quality among benefit corporations is lacking. This study aimed to fill this gap by proposing a methodology to assess the quality of sustainability disclosure in benefit corporations. Drawing from a sample of their sustainability reporting in Italy, the study applies qualitative content analysis to create the disclosure quality index and uses a regression model to test potential antecedents. The findings indicate a generally low level of disclosure quality and limited impact of third‐party certification and control mechanisms. These results raise questions on the accountability of benefit corporations and the limitations of their mandatory reporting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2025-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4311
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable but Not Accountable? A Quality Assessment of Sustainability Disclosure in Benefit Corporations

Silvia Cantele, Enrico Bracci, Vincenzo Riso
2 citations
Business Strategy and the Environment
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
4.45
article

Sustainable but Not Accountable? A Quality Assessment of Sustainability Disclosure in Benefit Corporations

Silvia Cantele, Enrico Bracci, Vincenzo Riso
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Benefit corporations are businesses characterised by a dual purpose: profit and the common good. While these businesses are expected to pursue a high level of transparency, some studies have noted ambiguous and inconsistent behaviour in the quality of their reports and communication with stakeholders. The literature proposed reporting quality indexes and identified explanatory factors, although specific research on disclosure quality among benefit corporations is lacking. This study aimed to fill this gap by proposing a methodology to assess the quality of sustainability disclosure in benefit corporations. Drawing from a sample of their sustainability reporting in Italy, the study applies qualitative content analysis to create the disclosure quality index and uses a regression model to test potential antecedents. The findings indicate a generally low level of disclosure quality and limited impact of third‐party certification and control mechanisms. These results raise questions on the accountability of benefit corporations and the limitations of their mandatory reporting.

Business Strategy and the EnvironmentVol. 34(6)
University of Verona (IT), University of Ferrara (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.