Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing: Opportunities and Risks from Planning to Publication

With the recent prevalence and enhanced accessibility of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, the aim of this review is to assess both the benefits and risks of using AI tools in academic writing, thus, allowing authors to make more informed decisions with regard to AI usage based on the current literature and the best available evidence. Between February and April 2024, the authors conducted a narrative review of the academic literature using AI focused keyword searches of databases including PubMed. Risks and benefits of using AI in academic writing were identified and subcategorised into four stages: planning, execution of research, drafting of a manuscript, and publication. The literature suggests that AI tools, particularly large language models, provide several potential benefits at each stage of academic writing. This includes assistance in idea generation, data analysis, peer review and drafting, with the potential to significantly improve overall efficiency. Significant challenges were also identified, including bias, plagiarism risk, and misleading AI-generated content (often referred to as hallucinations). In conclusion, AI tools appear to present promising opportunities for improving academic writing and could potentially revolutionise the process in which academic research is conducted. Careful consideration of their limitations with legal and ethical implications is paramount—thus, the authors recommend that a collaborative effort led by the academic community is needed to establish best practice guidelines and regulatory frameworks for the responsible and effective implementation of AI tools in the process of scientific publications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of The Best Available Evidence in Medicine
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63720/jqz1pdhl
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing: Opportunities and Risks from Planning to Publication

Aaron Williams, Shahzad G. Raja, Harry Smith
1 citations
Journal of The Best Available Evidence in Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing: Opportunities and Risks from Planning to Publication

Aaron Williams, Shahzad G. Raja, Harry Smith
article en
1 citations

Abstract

With the recent prevalence and enhanced accessibility of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, the aim of this review is to assess both the benefits and risks of using AI tools in academic writing, thus, allowing authors to make more informed decisions with regard to AI usage based on the current literature and the best available evidence. Between February and April 2024, the authors conducted a narrative review of the academic literature using AI focused keyword searches of databases including PubMed. Risks and benefits of using AI in academic writing were identified and subcategorised into four stages: planning, execution of research, drafting of a manuscript, and publication. The literature suggests that AI tools, particularly large language models, provide several potential benefits at each stage of academic writing. This includes assistance in idea generation, data analysis, peer review and drafting, with the potential to significantly improve overall efficiency. Significant challenges were also identified, including bias, plagiarism risk, and misleading AI-generated content (often referred to as hallucinations). In conclusion, AI tools appear to present promising opportunities for improving academic writing and could potentially revolutionise the process in which academic research is conducted. Careful consideration of their limitations with legal and ethical implications is paramount—thus, the authors recommend that a collaborative effort led by the academic community is needed to establish best practice guidelines and regulatory frameworks for the responsible and effective implementation of AI tools in the process of scientific publications.

Journal of The Best Available Evidence in MedicineVol. 1(1)
University of Cambridge (GB), Harefield Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing: Opportunities and Risks from Planning to Publication — Aaron Williams, Shahzad G. Raja, et al. · Journal of The Best Available Evidence in Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS