STIMULATING EFFECT OF TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRICAL EXPOSURE ON REPARATIVE PROCESSES IN AN EXPERIMENT

Electrical stimulation with analgesic current parameters is considered a promising method for developing effective and non-invasive pain relief and therapy methods due to its easily controllable and rapid pain relief, and the absence of side effects, toxic, and allergic complications. Purpose: to study the effect of transcranial electrical stimulation of the brain’s antinociceptive system on the healing process of skin wounds in laboratory animals. Materials and methods. The study involved 80 male non-linear white laboratory rats. The first experimental group used a mode of transcranial electrical stimulation combining direct and alternating currents with analgesic parameters. The second and third experimental groups used the same combination but with different pulse frequencies, i.e. 50 and 90 Hz (“non-analgesic irritation” frequencies). Sessions were conducted once a day for 30 minutes for three days after skin wounds were inflicted. Additionally, experiments were conducted with two modes of exposure: for three days before the wound infliction and three days after the operation (i.e. “preventive” and “therapeutic” effects), using both analgesic and non-analgesic modes of electrical exposure. Results. Under the influence of transcranial electrical stimulation with analgesic current parameters (70 Hz frequency), a significant acceleration by 21% of the healing process and a reduction in the average time for complete wound healing were observed. Transcranial exposures with “non-analgesic irritation frequencies” (50 and 90 Hz) did not cause any changes in the healing rate compared to the control. The greatest acceleration of wound healing under the influence of therapeutic procedures was significantly manifested on the 4th – 7th day after their infliction, while in the control group, it was on the 10th – 11th day. In the “preventive” group, the change in wound size significantly outpaced that of rats with “therapeutic” exposure: on the 4th day, the difference in wound area between the experimental groups and the control was statistically significant and amounted to 12%, while the “therapeutic” exposure reached a similar result by the 8th day. Conclusion. Information was obtained on the effect of electric current on brain electrical activity, behavioral reactions, and reparative processes. EDN: UUVZTP

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-6649-2024-16-6-1060
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Human Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

STIMULATING EFFECT OF TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRICAL EXPOSURE ON REPARATIVE PROCESSES IN AN EXPERIMENT

Denis V. Dashko, Maksim A. Uryadnikov
Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture
Ergonomics and Human Factors
article

STIMULATING EFFECT OF TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRICAL EXPOSURE ON REPARATIVE PROCESSES IN AN EXPERIMENT

Denis V. Dashko, Maksim A. Uryadnikov
article en

Abstract

Electrical stimulation with analgesic current parameters is considered a promising method for developing effective and non-invasive pain relief and therapy methods due to its easily controllable and rapid pain relief, and the absence of side effects, toxic, and allergic complications. Purpose: to study the effect of transcranial electrical stimulation of the brain’s antinociceptive system on the healing process of skin wounds in laboratory animals. Materials and methods. The study involved 80 male non-linear white laboratory rats. The first experimental group used a mode of transcranial electrical stimulation combining direct and alternating currents with analgesic parameters. The second and third experimental groups used the same combination but with different pulse frequencies, i.e. 50 and 90 Hz (“non-analgesic irritation” frequencies). Sessions were conducted once a day for 30 minutes for three days after skin wounds were inflicted. Additionally, experiments were conducted with two modes of exposure: for three days before the wound infliction and three days after the operation (i.e. “preventive” and “therapeutic” effects), using both analgesic and non-analgesic modes of electrical exposure. Results. Under the influence of transcranial electrical stimulation with analgesic current parameters (70 Hz frequency), a significant acceleration by 21% of the healing process and a reduction in the average time for complete wound healing were observed. Transcranial exposures with “non-analgesic irritation frequencies” (50 and 90 Hz) did not cause any changes in the healing rate compared to the control. The greatest acceleration of wound healing under the influence of therapeutic procedures was significantly manifested on the 4th – 7th day after their infliction, while in the control group, it was on the 10th – 11th day. In the “preventive” group, the change in wound size significantly outpaced that of rats with “therapeutic” exposure: on the 4th day, the difference in wound area between the experimental groups and the control was statistically significant and amounted to 12%, while the “therapeutic” exposure reached a similar result by the 8th day. Conclusion. Information was obtained on the effect of electric current on brain electrical activity, behavioral reactions, and reparative processes. EDN: UUVZTP

Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and AgricultureVol. 16(6)
Irkutsk State Agrarian University named after A.A. Ezhevsky (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Ergonomics and Human Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.