A Framework for The Design of Effective Learning Environments in the AI Era: Egyptian Students’ Preferences from Humanities versus Engineering Disciplines

The AI revolution has increased interest in the use of digital technologies and virtual reality learning environments (VRLEs) regardless of students’ discipline and the design of these environments. This study investigates students’ preferences from Humanities vs. Engineering disciplines towards diverse learning environments (LEs) and their design to enforce the design of effective LEs that promote the productivity and wellbeing for different disciplines. The research proposes a framework that integrates AI-driven technology-enhanced learning, learning and discipline-specific theories, inaddition to architecture design for human-wellbeing theories to design effective learning environments based on an interdisciplinary research. The methodology followed a cross-sectional, quantitative, non-experimental research design with 141 undergraduates from two private universities in Egypt. Results revealed that students of both disciplines preferred Physical classrooms. Following, Engineering students preferred Mixed LEs, but Humanities students preferred VRLEs over Online Learning. Furthermore, students from both disciplines rated “lighting” as the most important architectural design element in a physical and VR LEs, to enhance their focus and feeling comfortable, however, the ratings for the other two design elements differed between students of the two disciplines. Future research can make use of the proposed framework with larger samples. It is recommended to customize the design of LEs to adapt to students’ different disciplines, learning styles and customise design elements that enhance students’ wellbeing and productivity LEs. Using

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences/JES. Journal of engineering sciences
Published
2025-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/jesaun.2025.347140.1397
Primary Topic
Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Framework for The Design of Effective Learning Environments in the AI Era: Egyptian Students’ Preferences from Humanities versus Engineering Disciplines

Wesam Khairy Morsi, H. Assem
JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences/JES. Journal of engineering sciences
Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
article

A Framework for The Design of Effective Learning Environments in the AI Era: Egyptian Students’ Preferences from Humanities versus Engineering Disciplines

Wesam Khairy Morsi, H. Assem
article en

Abstract

The AI revolution has increased interest in the use of digital technologies and virtual reality learning environments (VRLEs) regardless of students’ discipline and the design of these environments. This study investigates students’ preferences from Humanities vs. Engineering disciplines towards diverse learning environments (LEs) and their design to enforce the design of effective LEs that promote the productivity and wellbeing for different disciplines. The research proposes a framework that integrates AI-driven technology-enhanced learning, learning and discipline-specific theories, inaddition to architecture design for human-wellbeing theories to design effective learning environments based on an interdisciplinary research. The methodology followed a cross-sectional, quantitative, non-experimental research design with 141 undergraduates from two private universities in Egypt. Results revealed that students of both disciplines preferred Physical classrooms. Following, Engineering students preferred Mixed LEs, but Humanities students preferred VRLEs over Online Learning. Furthermore, students from both disciplines rated “lighting” as the most important architectural design element in a physical and VR LEs, to enhance their focus and feeling comfortable, however, the ratings for the other two design elements differed between students of the two disciplines. Future research can make use of the proposed framework with larger samples. It is recommended to customize the design of LEs to adapt to students’ different disciplines, learning styles and customise design elements that enhance students’ wellbeing and productivity LEs. Using

JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences/JES. Journal of engineering sciencesVol. 0(0)
British University in Egypt (EG)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.