03 Monte Carlo Validation Approach for Evaluating the Uncertainty of Identical Force Intervals

Type A method is the GUM-adopted technique for evaluating the uncertainty of repeated observations. Unfortunately, the Type A method cannot provide any information about the dispersion of identical observations. This article introduces a reasonable approximation for the uncertainty of identical observations depending on the resolution of the limited-resolution measuring device and the number of identical observations. The proposed approach reduces the estimated uncertainty by at least 13.7% of the instrument’s resolution compared to the GUM method without sacrificing reliability. Moreover, the proposed approach is simple, straightforward, and easily implemented in daily routine work.Monte-Carlo simulation was performed to compare the proposed uncertainty statement of identical observations against the conventional Type A uncertainty of the observations indicated by finer-resolution devices. The simulation revealed that the percentage of agreement does not drop below 70% at worst according to the strictest criterion; for round-robins’ criterion, the agreement remained above 99%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Measurement Science and Applications (JMSA)
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/jmsa.2025.422909
Primary Topic
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

03 Monte Carlo Validation Approach for Evaluating the Uncertainty of Identical Force Intervals

I. S. ELDeeb, Ahmed A. Hawam, Mohamed ElWakil, K. M. Khaled
Journal of Measurement Science and Applications (JMSA)
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
article

03 Monte Carlo Validation Approach for Evaluating the Uncertainty of Identical Force Intervals

I. S. ELDeeb, Ahmed A. Hawam, Mohamed ElWakil, K. M. Khaled
article en

Abstract

Type A method is the GUM-adopted technique for evaluating the uncertainty of repeated observations. Unfortunately, the Type A method cannot provide any information about the dispersion of identical observations. This article introduces a reasonable approximation for the uncertainty of identical observations depending on the resolution of the limited-resolution measuring device and the number of identical observations. The proposed approach reduces the estimated uncertainty by at least 13.7% of the instrument’s resolution compared to the GUM method without sacrificing reliability. Moreover, the proposed approach is simple, straightforward, and easily implemented in daily routine work.Monte-Carlo simulation was performed to compare the proposed uncertainty statement of identical observations against the conventional Type A uncertainty of the observations indicated by finer-resolution devices. The simulation revealed that the percentage of agreement does not drop below 70% at worst according to the strictest criterion; for round-robins’ criterion, the agreement remained above 99%.

Journal of Measurement Science and Applications (JMSA)Vol. 5(1)
Tanta University (EG), National Institute of Standards (EG)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

03 Monte Carlo Validation Approach for Evaluating the Uncertainty of Identical Force Intervals — I. S. ELDeeb, Ahmed A. Hawam, et al. · Journal of Measurement Science and Applications (JMSA) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS