EPIC model prediction of winter rye cover crop effects on crop yield and nitrate‐N leaching in Minnesota

Abstract Coarse‐textured soils in central Minnesota cultivated with corn ( Zea mays L.) and soybean ( Glycine max L.) exhibit good productivity, however, are vulnerable to nitrate‐N leaching losses. In such circumstances, winter rye ( Secale cereale L.) as a cover crop may reduce nitrate‐N leaching by scavenging soil nitrogen (N) in late‐fall and early‐spring fallow period. The Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) model was used for decadal‐scale (2010–2020) simulation of yield/biomass and nitrate‐N leaching in corn– (C–C) and corn–soybean/soybean–corn (C–Sb/Sb–C) rotations, with and without winter rye, under different fertilizer N rates applied to corn (0, 100, 200, 250, and 300 kg ha −1 ) on irrigated coarse‐textured soils in central Minnesota. Model efficiency calculated based on Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient, relative root mean square error, and R 2 statistics indicate that EPIC assessment for calibration and validation treatments was excellent‐good for corn/soybean yield, and good‐satisfactory for rye biomass and NO 3 ‐N leaching losses. Results indicate that N fertilizer rates up to 250 kg N ha −1 applied to corn had a positive impact on rye biomass; however, large crop‐rotation and climate‐induced variations were observed. Annual nitrate‐N leaching losses at maximum return to nitrogen rates at a 0.05 N price to crop value ratio for corn under C–C (250 kg N ha −1 ) and C–Sb/Sb–C (200 kg N ha −1 ) with no‐rye averaged 61.5, 47.4, and 41.8 kg ha −1 , while grain yield averaged 12.5, 12.3, and 4.0 t ha −1 for corn (C–C), corn (C–Sb/Sb–C), and soybean (C–Sb/Sb–C), respectively. Planting rye under these rotations gave annual average reductions in nitrate‐N losses relative to corresponding no‐rye treatments of 2.9 (4.7%), 3.4 (7.3%), and 6.5 kg ha −1 (15.6%), with rye N uptake of 10.3, 12.1, and 33.5 kg ha −1 ; and rye biomass production of 0.61, 0.74, and 2.0 t ha −1 , respectively. EPIC assessment indicates that winter rye as cover crop did not negatively impact the subsequent corn/soybean yield and proved to be an effective strategy for reducing nitrate‐N losses, particularly following the soybean crop.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy Journal
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70065
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EPIC model prediction of winter rye cover crop effects on crop yield and nitrate‐N leaching in Minnesota

Fabián G. Fernández, Natalie Ricks, David J. MULLA, Muhammad Tahir
3 citations
Agronomy Journal
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
2.58
article

EPIC model prediction of winter rye cover crop effects on crop yield and nitrate‐N leaching in Minnesota

Fabián G. Fernández, Natalie Ricks, David J. MULLA, Muhammad Tahir
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Coarse‐textured soils in central Minnesota cultivated with corn ( Zea mays L.) and soybean ( Glycine max L.) exhibit good productivity, however, are vulnerable to nitrate‐N leaching losses. In such circumstances, winter rye ( Secale cereale L.) as a cover crop may reduce nitrate‐N leaching by scavenging soil nitrogen (N) in late‐fall and early‐spring fallow period. The Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) model was used for decadal‐scale (2010–2020) simulation of yield/biomass and nitrate‐N leaching in corn– (C–C) and corn–soybean/soybean–corn (C–Sb/Sb–C) rotations, with and without winter rye, under different fertilizer N rates applied to corn (0, 100, 200, 250, and 300 kg ha −1 ) on irrigated coarse‐textured soils in central Minnesota. Model efficiency calculated based on Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient, relative root mean square error, and R 2 statistics indicate that EPIC assessment for calibration and validation treatments was excellent‐good for corn/soybean yield, and good‐satisfactory for rye biomass and NO 3 ‐N leaching losses. Results indicate that N fertilizer rates up to 250 kg N ha −1 applied to corn had a positive impact on rye biomass; however, large crop‐rotation and climate‐induced variations were observed. Annual nitrate‐N leaching losses at maximum return to nitrogen rates at a 0.05 N price to crop value ratio for corn under C–C (250 kg N ha −1 ) and C–Sb/Sb–C (200 kg N ha −1 ) with no‐rye averaged 61.5, 47.4, and 41.8 kg ha −1 , while grain yield averaged 12.5, 12.3, and 4.0 t ha −1 for corn (C–C), corn (C–Sb/Sb–C), and soybean (C–Sb/Sb–C), respectively. Planting rye under these rotations gave annual average reductions in nitrate‐N losses relative to corresponding no‐rye treatments of 2.9 (4.7%), 3.4 (7.3%), and 6.5 kg ha −1 (15.6%), with rye N uptake of 10.3, 12.1, and 33.5 kg ha −1 ; and rye biomass production of 0.61, 0.74, and 2.0 t ha −1 , respectively. EPIC assessment indicates that winter rye as cover crop did not negatively impact the subsequent corn/soybean yield and proved to be an effective strategy for reducing nitrate‐N losses, particularly following the soybean crop.

Agronomy JournalVol. 117(3)
University of Minnesota (US)
Minnesota Department of Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
2.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.